A Memory-Interference Versus the ‘Dud’-Effect Account of a DRM False Memory Result: Fewer Related Targets at Test, Higher Critical-Lure False Recognition

Jerwen Jou; Mark Hwang

A Memory-Interference Versus the ‘Dud’-Effect Account of a DRM False Memory Result: Fewer Related Targets at Test, Higher Critical-Lure False Recognition

Business Information Systems

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1397-1404
Journal	Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume	29
State	Published - Mar 2022

Cite this

@article{4d24ac95a2d843f798b2022f84f20fc8,

title = "A Memory-Interference Versus the {\textquoteleft}Dud{\textquoteright}-Effect Account of a DRM False Memory Result: Fewer Related Targets at Test, Higher Critical-Lure False Recognition",

author = "Jerwen Jou and Mark Hwang",

year = "2022",

month = mar,

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "1397--1404",

journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin & Review",

publisher = "Psychonomic Bulletin & Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Memory-Interference Versus the ‘Dud’-Effect Account of a DRM False Memory Result: Fewer Related Targets at Test, Higher Critical-Lure False Recognition

AU - Jou, Jerwen

AU - Hwang, Mark

PY - 2022/3

Y1 - 2022/3

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02083-3

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1397

EP - 1404

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

ER -

A Memory-Interference Versus the ‘Dud’-Effect Account of a DRM False Memory Result: Fewer Related Targets at Test, Higher Critical-Lure False Recognition

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this