TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute changes of hip joint range of motion using selected clinical stretching procedures
T2 - A randomized crossover study
AU - Hammer, Adam M.
AU - Hammer, Roger L.
AU - Lomond, Karen V.
AU - O'Connor, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Background Hip adductor flexibility and strength is an important component of athletic performance and many activities of daily living. Little research has been done on the acute effects of a single session of stretching on hip abduction range of motion (ROM). Objectives The aim of this study was to compare 3 clinical stretching procedures against passive static stretching and control on ROM and peak isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Design Using a randomized crossover study design, a total of 40 participants (20 male and 20 female) who had reduced hip adductor muscle length attended a familiarization session and 5 testing sessions on non-consecutive days. Method Following the warm-up and pre-intervention measures of ROM and MVC, participants were randomly assigned 1 of 3 clinical stretching procedures (modified lunge, multidirectional, and joint mobilization) or a static stretch or control condition. Post-intervention measures of ROM and MVC were taken immediately following completion of the assigned condition. Results An ANOVA using a repeated measure design with the change score was conducted. All interventions resulted in small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases (1.0°–1.7°) in ROM with no inter-condition differences except one. Multidirectional stretching was greater than control (p = 0.031). Conclusions These data suggest that a single session of stretching has only a minimal effect on acute changes of hip abduction ROM. Although hip abduction is a frontal plane motion, to effectively increase the extensibility of the structures that limit abduction, integrating multi-planar stretches may be indicated.
AB - Background Hip adductor flexibility and strength is an important component of athletic performance and many activities of daily living. Little research has been done on the acute effects of a single session of stretching on hip abduction range of motion (ROM). Objectives The aim of this study was to compare 3 clinical stretching procedures against passive static stretching and control on ROM and peak isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Design Using a randomized crossover study design, a total of 40 participants (20 male and 20 female) who had reduced hip adductor muscle length attended a familiarization session and 5 testing sessions on non-consecutive days. Method Following the warm-up and pre-intervention measures of ROM and MVC, participants were randomly assigned 1 of 3 clinical stretching procedures (modified lunge, multidirectional, and joint mobilization) or a static stretch or control condition. Post-intervention measures of ROM and MVC were taken immediately following completion of the assigned condition. Results An ANOVA using a repeated measure design with the change score was conducted. All interventions resulted in small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases (1.0°–1.7°) in ROM with no inter-condition differences except one. Multidirectional stretching was greater than control (p = 0.031). Conclusions These data suggest that a single session of stretching has only a minimal effect on acute changes of hip abduction ROM. Although hip abduction is a frontal plane motion, to effectively increase the extensibility of the structures that limit abduction, integrating multi-planar stretches may be indicated.
KW - Hip adductor flexibility
KW - Maximal voluntary contraction
KW - Stretching intensity
KW - Warm-up procedures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033704593&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.08.011
DO - 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.08.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 28888207
SN - 2468-8630
VL - 32
SP - 70
EP - 77
JO - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
JF - Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
ER -