TY - GEN
T1 - Advancing Adoption of Active Learning Pedagogy via New Avenues of Research and Training
AU - Eickholt, Jesse
AU - Gandy, Lisa
AU - Seeling, Patrick
AU - Johnson, Matthew
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based on work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1608043.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - This Work in Progress in the Research to Practice Category advocates for new evidence-based training opportunities for potential future faculty to increase student access to active learning. Active learning has been used in the classroom for years and demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of enhancing students' performance. In spite of the reported benefits of active learning, a sizable gap exists between faculty that are aware of active learning as a teaching style and those that adopt it for their classrooms. In response, the broader community has developed several successful aids to overcome often cited barriers to adoption. Nevertheless, this gap remains and indicates the need for further interpretation of existing research as well as additional avenues of research and training to advance adoption. These avenues should augment existing initiatives to increase adoption and further understanding of faculty reticence. Based on the current topography of active learning and its adoption, we argue for new training mechanisms to be offered at the graduate level that would have broad appeal and provide a foundation for evidence-based techniques. We also argue for research that is more inclusive and qualitative in nature to specifically explore faculty attitudes, beliefs, and backgrounds as they pertain to instruction.
AB - This Work in Progress in the Research to Practice Category advocates for new evidence-based training opportunities for potential future faculty to increase student access to active learning. Active learning has been used in the classroom for years and demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of enhancing students' performance. In spite of the reported benefits of active learning, a sizable gap exists between faculty that are aware of active learning as a teaching style and those that adopt it for their classrooms. In response, the broader community has developed several successful aids to overcome often cited barriers to adoption. Nevertheless, this gap remains and indicates the need for further interpretation of existing research as well as additional avenues of research and training to advance adoption. These avenues should augment existing initiatives to increase adoption and further understanding of faculty reticence. Based on the current topography of active learning and its adoption, we argue for new training mechanisms to be offered at the graduate level that would have broad appeal and provide a foundation for evidence-based techniques. We also argue for research that is more inclusive and qualitative in nature to specifically explore faculty attitudes, beliefs, and backgrounds as they pertain to instruction.
KW - active learning
KW - graduate training
KW - professional development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082459946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028603
DO - 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028603
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85082459946
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
BT - 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 49th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2019
Y2 - 16 October 2019 through 19 October 2019
ER -