TY - JOUR
T1 - An oxyfuel combustion-based torrefaction process
T2 - Technoeconomic analysis
AU - Hasan, M.
AU - Haseli, Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - A torrefaction process operating on oxyfuel combustion concept is introduced. The working fluid employed in the process is carbon dioxide captured from the combustion products. The thermodynamic modeling of the process is carried out to determine the energy requirement, recycled CO2flow rate, energy yield, and CO2production rate at various torrefaction conditions. The total capital investment and production costs of the new system are also estimated. By increasing the torrefaction severity, the CO2production rate, recycled gas mass, and the process thermal energy requirement increase, whereas the grinding energy and the energy yield decrease. A comparison made between the performance and economic parameters of the new and a conventional torrefaction processes shows that the proposed process is expected to produce torrefied wood pellet of compatible fuel quality and overall efficiency while eliminating CO2and NOx emissions at the expense of 11.5% and 9% increase in the capital and production costs, respectively. The proposed torrefaction process requires 91.8 M$ capital investment and 113.2 $ to produce 1 ton of torrefied wood pellets with 91% energy yield and 88% overall plant efficiency. Sensitivity analysis shows that the reactor type and raw biomass costs have significant impact on cost structures.
AB - A torrefaction process operating on oxyfuel combustion concept is introduced. The working fluid employed in the process is carbon dioxide captured from the combustion products. The thermodynamic modeling of the process is carried out to determine the energy requirement, recycled CO2flow rate, energy yield, and CO2production rate at various torrefaction conditions. The total capital investment and production costs of the new system are also estimated. By increasing the torrefaction severity, the CO2production rate, recycled gas mass, and the process thermal energy requirement increase, whereas the grinding energy and the energy yield decrease. A comparison made between the performance and economic parameters of the new and a conventional torrefaction processes shows that the proposed process is expected to produce torrefied wood pellet of compatible fuel quality and overall efficiency while eliminating CO2and NOx emissions at the expense of 11.5% and 9% increase in the capital and production costs, respectively. The proposed torrefaction process requires 91.8 M$ capital investment and 113.2 $ to produce 1 ton of torrefied wood pellets with 91% energy yield and 88% overall plant efficiency. Sensitivity analysis shows that the reactor type and raw biomass costs have significant impact on cost structures.
KW - COcapture
KW - Cost analysis
KW - Energy conversion/systems
KW - Energy from biomass
KW - Energy systems analysis
KW - Overall efficiency
KW - Oxyfuel combustion
KW - Torrefaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085646930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.4044560
DO - 10.1115/1.4044560
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085646930
SN - 0195-0738
VL - 142
JO - Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
JF - Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME
IS - 3
M1 - 032205
ER -