TY - JOUR
T1 - Antarctic Circumpolar Current Transport Through Drake Passage
T2 - What Can We Learn From Comparing High-Resolution Model Results to Observations?
AU - Xu, Xiaobiao
AU - Chassignet, Eric P.
AU - Firing, Yvonne L.
AU - Donohue, Kathleen
N1 - Funding Information:
X.X. and E.P.C. are supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Physical Oceanography Program (award 1537136) and by the Office of Naval Research (N00014‐19‐12717). Y.L.F. is supported by U.K. Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/N018095/1. The global ocean‐sea ice simulation was performed on supercomputers at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) in Vicksburg, Mississippi, and the U.S. Navy DoD Supercomputing Resource Center (DSRC) in Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, using computer time provided by the U.S. DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program.
Funding Information:
X.X. and E.P.C. are supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Physical Oceanography Program (award 1537136) and by the Office of Naval Research (N00014-19-12717). Y.L.F. is supported by U.K. Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/N018095/1. The global ocean-sea ice simulation was performed on supercomputers at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) in Vicksburg, Mississippi, and the U.S. Navy DoD Supercomputing Resource Center (DSRC) in Stennis Space Center, Mississippi, using computer time provided by the U.S. DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program.
Publisher Copyright:
©2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Uncertainty exists in the time-mean total transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), the world's strongest ocean current. The two most recent observational programs in Drake Passage, DRAKE and cDrake, yielded transports of 141 and 173.3 Sv, respectively. In this paper, we use a realistic 1/12° global ocean simulation to interpret these observational estimates and reconcile their differences. We first show that the modeled ACC transport in the upper 1,000 m is in excellent agreement with repeat shipboard acoustic Doppler current profiler (SADCP) transects and that the exponentially decaying transport profile in the model is consistent with the profile derived from repeat hydrographic data. By further comparing the model results to the cDrake and DRAKE observations, we argue that the modeled 157.3 Sv transport, that is, approximately the average of the cDrake and DRAKE estimates, is actually representative of the time-mean ACC transport through the Drake Passage. The cDrake experiment overestimated the barotropic contribution in part because the array undersampled the deep recirculation southwest of the Shackleton Fracture Zone, whereas the surface geostrophic currents used in the DRAKE estimate yielded a weaker near-surface transport than implied by the SADCP data. We also find that the modeled baroclinic and barotropic transports are not correlated; thus, monitoring either baroclinic or barotropic transport alone may be insufficient to assess the temporal variability of the total ACC transport.
AB - Uncertainty exists in the time-mean total transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC), the world's strongest ocean current. The two most recent observational programs in Drake Passage, DRAKE and cDrake, yielded transports of 141 and 173.3 Sv, respectively. In this paper, we use a realistic 1/12° global ocean simulation to interpret these observational estimates and reconcile their differences. We first show that the modeled ACC transport in the upper 1,000 m is in excellent agreement with repeat shipboard acoustic Doppler current profiler (SADCP) transects and that the exponentially decaying transport profile in the model is consistent with the profile derived from repeat hydrographic data. By further comparing the model results to the cDrake and DRAKE observations, we argue that the modeled 157.3 Sv transport, that is, approximately the average of the cDrake and DRAKE estimates, is actually representative of the time-mean ACC transport through the Drake Passage. The cDrake experiment overestimated the barotropic contribution in part because the array undersampled the deep recirculation southwest of the Shackleton Fracture Zone, whereas the surface geostrophic currents used in the DRAKE estimate yielded a weaker near-surface transport than implied by the SADCP data. We also find that the modeled baroclinic and barotropic transports are not correlated; thus, monitoring either baroclinic or barotropic transport alone may be insufficient to assess the temporal variability of the total ACC transport.
KW - ACC
KW - Drake Passage
KW - high-resolution model
KW - volume transport
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088918223&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2020JC016365
DO - 10.1029/2020JC016365
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85088918223
VL - 125
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
SN - 2169-9275
IS - 7
M1 - e2020JC016365
ER -