TY - JOUR
T1 - Aquatic mesocosm assessments of a neem (azadirachtin) insecticide at environmentally realistic concentrations - 2
T2 - Zooplankton community responses and recovery
AU - Kreutzweiser, David P.
AU - Back, Richard C.
AU - Sutton, Trent M.
AU - Pangle, Kevin L.
AU - Thompson, Dean G.
N1 - Funding Information:
We appreciate the technical assistance in field sampling and sample processing provided by Scott Capell, Kevin Good, Leslie Clark, Eric Fralic, Marcus Taube, and Derek Martin. This study was supported in part by the Spray Efficacy Research Group members Quebec, Newfoundland, and New Brunswick; by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources; and by the Enhanced Timber Production & Protection Network of the Canadian Forest Service. Certis USA provided the Neemix 4.5. Mention of certain manufactured products or equipment in this text does not imply endorsement by the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada.
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - A neem-based insecticide, Neemix 4.5, was applied to forest pond enclosures at environmentally realistic concentrations (i.e., below the worst-case expected environmental concentration of 35μgL-1). Crustacean zooplankton communities were examined by multivariate ordination (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) and time-course analyses of population trends among indicator taxa over two field seasons to determine application effects on community structure and recovery patterns. Significant effects on zooplankton community structure were detected at all main test concentrations (n=5) of 28, 17, and 10μgL-1 azadirachtin. There was also evidence of adverse effects on zooplankton communities at an auxiliary test concentration (n=2) of 5μgL-1 azadirachtin. Community-level effects resulted primarily from reductions in adult copepods with short-term, reciprocal increases in cladocerans. Copepod nauplii were not significantly affected. Response patterns suggested that the reductions in adult copepods resulted from growth-regulating effects of the active ingredient azadirachtin, or other neem compounds, and not from formulation ingredients. There was no evidence of recovery among adult copepods within the season of application. At the beginning of the second sampling season, there were apparent carryover effects similar to the community responses in the previous year. By the end of the second season, there was evidence indicating recovery of community structure at the two lower test concentrations of 10 and 17μgL-1, but not at 28μgL -1. The selective toxicity to adult copepods is problematic in that this group has a relatively long life cycle (1 year), contributes a major component of zooplankton biomass and respiration, and occupies critical functional guilds within zooplankton food web structures. Mitigation measures such as reductions in application rates and efforts to avoid deposition of sprayed materials on water bodies will be required to reduce the risk of harmful effects on zooplankton communities of forest ponds and other shallow, standing-water bodies.
AB - A neem-based insecticide, Neemix 4.5, was applied to forest pond enclosures at environmentally realistic concentrations (i.e., below the worst-case expected environmental concentration of 35μgL-1). Crustacean zooplankton communities were examined by multivariate ordination (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) and time-course analyses of population trends among indicator taxa over two field seasons to determine application effects on community structure and recovery patterns. Significant effects on zooplankton community structure were detected at all main test concentrations (n=5) of 28, 17, and 10μgL-1 azadirachtin. There was also evidence of adverse effects on zooplankton communities at an auxiliary test concentration (n=2) of 5μgL-1 azadirachtin. Community-level effects resulted primarily from reductions in adult copepods with short-term, reciprocal increases in cladocerans. Copepod nauplii were not significantly affected. Response patterns suggested that the reductions in adult copepods resulted from growth-regulating effects of the active ingredient azadirachtin, or other neem compounds, and not from formulation ingredients. There was no evidence of recovery among adult copepods within the season of application. At the beginning of the second sampling season, there were apparent carryover effects similar to the community responses in the previous year. By the end of the second season, there was evidence indicating recovery of community structure at the two lower test concentrations of 10 and 17μgL-1, but not at 28μgL -1. The selective toxicity to adult copepods is problematic in that this group has a relatively long life cycle (1 year), contributes a major component of zooplankton biomass and respiration, and occupies critical functional guilds within zooplankton food web structures. Mitigation measures such as reductions in application rates and efforts to avoid deposition of sprayed materials on water bodies will be required to reduce the risk of harmful effects on zooplankton communities of forest ponds and other shallow, standing-water bodies.
KW - Aquatic mesocosms
KW - Azadirachtin
KW - Community structure
KW - Impacts
KW - Neem
KW - Recovery
KW - Zooplankton
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942515887&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.09.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 15327875
AN - SCOPUS:1942515887
SN - 0147-6513
VL - 59
SP - 194
EP - 204
JO - Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
JF - Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
IS - 2
ER -