Abstract
Many researchers and interviewers have become disenchanted with the practice of using anatomically detailed (AD) dolls during forensic investigations, yet there is still support for doll-assisted interviews. This comment discusses five major concerns about AD dolls, involving child-related and interviewer-related factors. The research findings suggest that individuals who advocate for AD dolls bear the burden of proving that dolls are the best alternative for eliciting information about personally-experienced events from children.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 63-74 |
Journal | Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice |
Volume | 5 |
State | Published - 2005 |