Cardioprotection with postconditioning: Loss of efficacy in murine models of type-2 and type-1 diabetes

Karin Przyklenk, Michelle Maynard, Dale L. Greiner, Peter Whittaker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

104 Scopus citations

Abstract

Postconditioning (PostC), or relief of myocardial ischemia in a stuttered manner, has been shown to reduce infarct size, due in part to upregulation of survival kinase signaling. Virtually all of these data have, however, been obtained in healthy adult cohorts; the question of whether PostC-induced cardioprotection is maintained in the setting of clinically relevant comorbidities has remained largely unexplored. Accordingly, our aim was to assess the consequences of a major risk factor-diabetes-on the infarct-sparing effect of stuttered reflow. Isolated buffer-perfused hearts were obtained from normoglycemic C57BL/6J mice, BKS.Cg-m+/+Leprdb/J (db/db) mice (model of type-2 diabetes), C57BL/6J mice injected with streptozotocin (model of type-1 diabetes), and streptozotocin-injected mice in which normoglycemia was re-established by islet cell transplantation. All hearts underwent 30 min of ischemia and, within each cohort, hearts received either standard (control) reperfusion or three to six 10-s cycles of stuttered reflow. PostC reduced infarct size via upregulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in normoglycemic mice. In contrast, diabetic hearts were refractory to PostC-induced cardioprotection-an effect that, in the type-1 model, was reversed by restoration of normoglycemia. We provide novel evidence for a profound-but potentially reversible-diabetes-induced defect in the cardioprotective efficacy of PostC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)781-790
Number of pages10
JournalAntioxidants and Redox Signaling
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardioprotection with postconditioning: Loss of efficacy in murine models of type-2 and type-1 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this