Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents

Debra Ann Poole, D. Stephen Lindsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

170 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examined how misleading suggestions from parents influenced children's eyewitness reports. Children (3 to 8 years old) participated in science demonstrations, listened to their parents read a story that described experienced and nonexperienced events, and subsequently discussed the science experience in two follow-up interviews. Many children described fictitious events in response to open-ended prompts, and there were no age differences in suggestibility during this phase of the interview. Accuracy declined markedly in response to direct questions, especially for the younger children. Although the older children retracted many of their false reports after receiving source-monitoring instructions, the younger children did not. Path analyses indicated that acquiescence, free recall, and source monitoring all contribute to mediating patterns of suggestibility across age. Results indicate that judgments about the accuracy of children's testimony must consider the possibility of exposure to misinformation prior to formal interviews.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-50
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this