Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Iliac Artery Tortuosity and Calcification

Matthew G. Doyle, Sean A. Crawford, Elrasheed Osman, Jessica Hatch, Leonard W. Tse, Cristina H. Amon, Thomas L. Forbes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: During endovascular aneurysm repair, the iliac artery typically serves as a conduit for device delivery. The degree of tortuosity and calcification in the iliac artery ultimately determines whether the device can successfully traverse the vessel. These 2 parameters can be assessed using qualitative approaches or calculated using quantitative methods based on the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards. The objective of this study was to determine whether qualitative methods are sufficient to accurately assess iliac artery tortuosity and calcification by calculating interobserver variability and comparing them to the SVS Reporting Standards. Methods: Three vascular surgeons reviewed preoperative computed tomography scans for 50 patients who underwent fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and qualitatively assessed left and right iliac artery tortuosity and calcification. Iliac artery geometries were segmented from these image sets. Tortuosity index and calcification length ratio were calculated and categorized based on the SVS Reporting Standards. Results: Interobserver variability was calculated for the qualitative assessments using interclass correlation coefficients. For tortuosity index, among the 3 observers, good agreement was found for the left iliac artery and fair agreement was found for the right. For calcification length ratio, excellent agreement was found for both iliac arteries. When compared to the quantitative assessment, the qualitative assessments underpredicted tortuosity in 2.3% of cases, matched the quantitative values in 16.7% of cases, and overpredicted tortuosity in 81.0% of cases. The qualitative assessments underpredicted calcification in 46.3% of cases, matched the quantitative values in 49.3% of cases, and overpredicted calcification in 4.3% of cases. Conclusion: Qualitative assessment of iliac artery tortuosity showed fair-to-good interobserver agreement and poor agreement to SVS Reporting Standards. Qualitative assessment of iliac artery calcification showed excellent interobserver agreement and fair agreement to SVS Reporting Standards. These trends should be considered when qualitative reporting methodologies are used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-469
Number of pages6
JournalVascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume53
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • SVS Reporting Standards
  • calcification
  • iliac arteries
  • qualitative assessment
  • tortuosity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Iliac Artery Tortuosity and Calcification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this