Decision trade-offs for cost-constrained fisheries management

L. Richard Little, André E. Punt, Catherine M. Dichmont, Natalie Dowling, David C. Smith, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Miriana Sporcic, Rebecca J. Gorton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Fisheries management operates in an environment characterized by multiple risks. These risks are often complementary and can be traded off against each other. An important goal for managers is to develop strategies to minimize the overall risk exposure at minimal cost. We show a simple model that quantifies a range of risks faced by fisheries management agencies in terms of long-term expected budgetary expenditure. The model includes not only the cost a management agency would be expected to incur from overfishing a stock, or from being seen to overfish it, but also the social cost incurred fromnot achieving its objectives, such as the opportunity cost of foregoing catches and economic returns. These costs can be controlled by adjusting the biomass level targeted by management, or increasing expenditures for data collection to improve the precision of biomass estimates. The overall risk, expressed as the long-term total expected cost to a management agency, depends strongly on the fisheries management objectives, and the emphasis on conservation or economic motives. In general, management under a conservation-oriented objective would reduce risk either by increasing target biomass levels or by expenditure on monitoring and assessment, while a catch-focused objective would seek to lowermanagement costs by reducing expenditure on datacollection and assessment. Increased natural stock variability affects the risk of overfishing, and long-term expected costs as the ability to make a meaningful estimate of biomass declines. Management of catchfocused fisheries would reduce the biomass target as stock variability increases, because the benefit of catches are seen to outweigh the cost, or risk of being overfished. The model provides the basis for more extensive risk analyses, and serves as a simple lesson that the consequences of reducing the short-term costs associated with managing a fishery can come with a concomitant increase in overall risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)494-502
Number of pages9
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • False-negative estimation error
  • False-positive estimation error
  • Fisheries management cost
  • Risk equivalency
  • Risk-cost-catch trade-off

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decision trade-offs for cost-constrained fisheries management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this