TY - JOUR
T1 - Do Different Kinds of Minds Need Different Kinds of Services? Qualitative Results from a Mixed-Method Survey of Service Preferences of Autistic Adults and Parents
AU - Cascio, M. Ariel
AU - Racine, Eric
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded by a Kids Brain Health Network Core Award, the NeuroEthics Excellence and Societal Innovation Core (NESIC; Racine co-PI). Dr. Cascio was additionally funded by the Angelo-Pizzagalli Scholarship of the IRCM Foundation and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada’s Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship. Dr. Racine was additionally funded by a FRQ-S senior scholar career award.
Funding Information:
Preliminary results from this study were presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting in 2018 (Cascio, M.A., Crafa, D., and E. Racine. 2018. Entanglements of Care in Autism Services in Europe and North America) and 2017 (Cascio, M.A. and E. Racine. 2017. The Biopolitics of Specificity: Autism Service Preferences in Europe and North America), both as oral presentations. This project was funded by a Kids Brain Health Network Core Award, the NeuroEthics Excellence and Societal Innovation Core (NESIC; Racine co-PI). Dr. Cascio was additionally funded by the Angelo-Pizzagalli Scholarship of the IRCM Foundation and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada’s Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship. Dr. Racine was additionally funded by a FRQ-S senior scholar career award. We acknowledgme the substantial contributions of Daina Crafa in qualitative analysis and contributions to an earlier draft of this paper. We thank Wade Bittle (Plain Language Strategist, Convergent Knowledge, ckhealth@shaw.ca, Calgary, Alberta) for reviewing the survey for plain language and autism-friendly accessibility. We also thank the following people who contributed to this study via translation, back-translation, community feedback, and/or research assistance: John Aspler, Morgane Aubineau, Aline Bogossian, Roxanne Caron, Dominique Cartier, Noha Elsherbini, Audrey Francouer, Laura Gilmour, Maria Imoli, Marianne Kania, Alice Larontonda, Ms. Lukas, Friedrich Nolte, Cristina Panisi, Sebastian Sattler, Anouk Sugar, and Enrico Valtellina. We also thank current and former members of the Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit for consistent feedback throughout this project, especially Nicole Padley and Wren Boehlen for reviewing the final draft, and sincerely apologize for any aknowledgments we have missed for assistance received over this lengthy and complex endeavor.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Many services can assist autistic people, such as early intervention, vocational services, or support groups. Scholars and activists debate whether such services should be autism-specific or more general/inclusive/mainstream. This debate rests on not only clinical reasoning, but also ethical and social reasoning about values and practicalities of diversity and inclusion. This paper presents qualitative results from a mixed-methods study. An online survey asked autistic adults and parents of autistic people of any age in Canada, the United States, Italy, France, and Germany what types of services they prefer (autism-specific, mixed-disability, or general/inclusive/mainstream). This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages of different service types, identified through inductive thematic coding and organized into higher-level themes focusing on clinical, structural, societal, interpersonal, and personal aspects of services. Autism-specific services were praised for addressing autism needs, helping clinically, and providing interpersonal benefits of others understanding autism; general services were praised for inclusion, helping clinically, community obligations and awareness, and social skills development. Looking at the interaction of these different aspects in respondent narratives nuances debates about autism-specificity, with a complex interplay between clinical, interpersonal, and societal aspects. Clinical and social perspectives are not necessarily separate and opposed, but intertwined based on different understandings of inclusion. Compared to parents, adults focused more on harm/safety issues, enjoyment, and stereotyping among other themes, attending to personal themes. These findings do not identify one best service type, but suggest that determining the right service in a given context may be informed by definitions of and goals about inclusion.
AB - Many services can assist autistic people, such as early intervention, vocational services, or support groups. Scholars and activists debate whether such services should be autism-specific or more general/inclusive/mainstream. This debate rests on not only clinical reasoning, but also ethical and social reasoning about values and practicalities of diversity and inclusion. This paper presents qualitative results from a mixed-methods study. An online survey asked autistic adults and parents of autistic people of any age in Canada, the United States, Italy, France, and Germany what types of services they prefer (autism-specific, mixed-disability, or general/inclusive/mainstream). This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages of different service types, identified through inductive thematic coding and organized into higher-level themes focusing on clinical, structural, societal, interpersonal, and personal aspects of services. Autism-specific services were praised for addressing autism needs, helping clinically, and providing interpersonal benefits of others understanding autism; general services were praised for inclusion, helping clinically, community obligations and awareness, and social skills development. Looking at the interaction of these different aspects in respondent narratives nuances debates about autism-specificity, with a complex interplay between clinical, interpersonal, and societal aspects. Clinical and social perspectives are not necessarily separate and opposed, but intertwined based on different understandings of inclusion. Compared to parents, adults focused more on harm/safety issues, enjoyment, and stereotyping among other themes, attending to personal themes. These findings do not identify one best service type, but suggest that determining the right service in a given context may be informed by definitions of and goals about inclusion.
KW - Autism
KW - Inclusion
KW - Neurodiversity
KW - Service provision
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126359274&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12152-022-09487-x
DO - 10.1007/s12152-022-09487-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126359274
VL - 15
JO - Neuroethics
JF - Neuroethics
SN - 1874-5490
IS - 1
M1 - 13
ER -