Entangled values: A reply to dodd

Robert Stecker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Scopus citations


    It is not uncommon these days to claim that we should distinguish between artistic value and other types of value, including aesthetic value. A problem for this proposal is posed by the fact that artworks have valuable properties that are no part of its artistic value. Unless there is a way to distinguish artistically valuable properties from other valuable properties, some will be unconvinced that the distinction is viable.1 For this reason, I have proposed a test for artistic value to underwrite support for the distinction.2 The main idea of the test is that we gain access to artistic values of artworks by means of understanding or appreciating those works, and this is not necessary to identify a work's non- Artistic values. Julian Dodd has argued the test is flawed and his criticism is based on a phenomenon I will call value entanglement.3 In this paper, I will identify the interesting phenomena of value entanglement, argue that it does not threaten the current version of the test I endorse, and explore whether there are other problems for that test.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)393-398
    Number of pages6
    JournalThe British Journal of Aesthetics
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2015


    Dive into the research topics of 'Entangled values: A reply to dodd'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this