European union actorness in international institutions: Why the EU is recognized as an actor in some international institutions, but not in others

Thomas Gehring, Sebastian Oberthür, Marc Mühleck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article examines why the European Union (EU) is recognized as a relevant actor in some international institutions, but not in others. Drawing on theories of international institutions and corporate action, it develops a theoretical approach toward EU actorness that demonstrates under which conditions third parties gain an interest in recognizing this actor as a relevant party to international institutions and how the EU can become an actor in its own right. The EU is expected to be recognized as a relevant actor in an international institution if it has acquired action capability in the relevant governance area, while formal status plays an inferior role. This hypothesis is subsequently assessed for six international institutions that vary regarding the degree of EU action capability and the EU's formal status, including the WTO and IMF, FAO and WHO as well as two international environmental regimes. Empirical results confirm the fruitfulness of the theoretical approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)849-865
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'European union actorness in international institutions: Why the EU is recognized as an actor in some international institutions, but not in others'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this