Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors

Svetlana Vladimir Ivanitskaya; Terry A. Beehr; Curtiss P. Hansen; Dmitry Erofeev; David M. Gudanowski

doi:10.1002/job.113

Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors

Svetlana Vladimir Ivanitskaya, Terry A. Beehr, Curtiss P. Hansen, Dmitry Erofeev, David M. Gudanowski

Health Administration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

Feedback from 360 degree ratings based on competency principles and used for developmental purposes was investigated for interrelationships among the ratings and for its relationships with performance and selection data. Relationships among: (1) feedback ratings from supervisors, peers, and self; (2) feedback ratings and selection test data; and (3) feedback ratings and performance appraisals on about 2000 employees of a Midwestern insurance company were examined. The 360 ratings by peers and managers were related to performance appraisals. All significant correlations of manager and peer ratings with selection tests were positive, but significant correlations of 360 degree self-ratings with selection tests were negative.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	775-788
Number of pages	14
Journal	Journal of Organizational Behavior
Volume	22
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/job.113
State	Published - Nov 2001

Access to Document

10.1002/job.113

Cite this

Ivanitskaya, S. V., Beehr, T. A., Hansen, C. P., Erofeev, D., & Gudanowski, D. M. (2001). Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(7), 775-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.113

@article{9c52f84b688d4c078e0ccd060850f0b8,

title = "Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors",

abstract = "Feedback from 360 degree ratings based on competency principles and used for developmental purposes was investigated for interrelationships among the ratings and for its relationships with performance and selection data. Relationships among: (1) feedback ratings from supervisors, peers, and self; (2) feedback ratings and selection test data; and (3) feedback ratings and performance appraisals on about 2000 employees of a Midwestern insurance company were examined. The 360 ratings by peers and managers were related to performance appraisals. All significant correlations of manager and peer ratings with selection tests were positive, but significant correlations of 360 degree self-ratings with selection tests were negative.",

author = "Ivanitskaya, {Svetlana Vladimir} and Beehr, {Terry A.} and Hansen, {Curtiss P.} and Dmitry Erofeev and Gudanowski, {David M.}",

year = "2001",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1002/job.113",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "775--788",

journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",

issn = "0894-3796",

publisher = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",

number = "7",

}

Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors. / Ivanitskaya, Svetlana Vladimir; Beehr, Terry A.; Hansen, Curtiss P. et al.
In: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 7, 11.2001, p. 775-788.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors

T2 - Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors

AU - Ivanitskaya, Svetlana Vladimir

AU - Beehr, Terry A.

AU - Hansen, Curtiss P.

AU - Erofeev, Dmitry

AU - Gudanowski, David M.

PY - 2001/11

Y1 - 2001/11

N2 - Feedback from 360 degree ratings based on competency principles and used for developmental purposes was investigated for interrelationships among the ratings and for its relationships with performance and selection data. Relationships among: (1) feedback ratings from supervisors, peers, and self; (2) feedback ratings and selection test data; and (3) feedback ratings and performance appraisals on about 2000 employees of a Midwestern insurance company were examined. The 360 ratings by peers and managers were related to performance appraisals. All significant correlations of manager and peer ratings with selection tests were positive, but significant correlations of 360 degree self-ratings with selection tests were negative.

AB - Feedback from 360 degree ratings based on competency principles and used for developmental purposes was investigated for interrelationships among the ratings and for its relationships with performance and selection data. Relationships among: (1) feedback ratings from supervisors, peers, and self; (2) feedback ratings and selection test data; and (3) feedback ratings and performance appraisals on about 2000 employees of a Midwestern insurance company were examined. The 360 ratings by peers and managers were related to performance appraisals. All significant correlations of manager and peer ratings with selection tests were positive, but significant correlations of 360 degree self-ratings with selection tests were negative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035598925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/job.113

DO - 10.1002/job.113

M3 - Article

SN - 0894-3796

VL - 22

SP - 775

EP - 788

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

IS - 7

ER -

Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this