Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors

Terry A. Beehr, Lana Ivanitskaya, Curtiss P. Hansen, Dmitry Erofeev, David M. Gudanowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

Feedback from 360 degree ratings based on competency principles and used for developmental purposes was investigated for interrelationships among the ratings and for its relationships with performance and selection data. Relationships among: (1) feedback ratings from supervisors, peers, and self; (2) feedback ratings and selection test data; and (3) feedback ratings and performance appraisals on about 2000 employees of a Midwestern insurance company were examined. The 360 ratings by peers and managers were related to performance appraisals. All significant correlations of manager and peer ratings with selection tests were positive, but significant correlations of 360 degree self-ratings with selection tests were negative.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-788
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume22
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of 360 degree feedback ratings: Relationships with each other and with performance and selection predictors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this