Expanding the Concept of Materiality to Environmental, Social, and Governance: Audit Issues and Implications

Thomas R. Weirich, Lynn Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

SUMMARY: The concept of materiality has long been a basic feature in U.S. securities laws and regulations. With the current global and U.S. efforts to develop new disclosure standards for environmental, social, and governance, a debate has emerged regarding the expansion of the definition of materiality. An expanded definition would include not only financial materiality (i.e., how information affects an investor’s decision to buy or sell) but also environmental and social materiality (i.e., how a company’s operations impact the climate, its employees, consumers, and society). This is referred to as “double materiality” (European Union 2019). However, as discussed in this paper, the concept of materiality set forth in U.S. securities laws and court decisions are contrary to the concept of double materiality. This paper provides a brief history of materiality and expansion of the concept and discusses audit issues and implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)A50-A58
JournalCurrent Issues in Auditing
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ESG
  • audit issues
  • double materiality
  • materiality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expanding the Concept of Materiality to Environmental, Social, and Governance: Audit Issues and Implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this