TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanding the Concept of Materiality to Environmental, Social, and Governance
T2 - Audit Issues and Implications
AU - Weirich, Thomas R.
AU - Turner, Lynn
N1 - Funding Information:
Finding the views of professional and nonprofessional investors may differ significantly in terms of financial materiality, DeZoort, Holt, and Stanley (2022) caution auditors to “consider the various dimensions of the meaning of ‘reasonable’ investor in planning the audit and applying professional standards.”.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, American Accounting Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - SUMMARY: The concept of materiality has long been a basic feature in U.S. securities laws and regulations. With the current global and U.S. efforts to develop new disclosure standards for environmental, social, and governance, a debate has emerged regarding the expansion of the definition of materiality. An expanded definition would include not only financial materiality (i.e., how information affects an investor’s decision to buy or sell) but also environmental and social materiality (i.e., how a company’s operations impact the climate, its employees, consumers, and society). This is referred to as “double materiality” (European Union 2019). However, as discussed in this paper, the concept of materiality set forth in U.S. securities laws and court decisions are contrary to the concept of double materiality. This paper provides a brief history of materiality and expansion of the concept and discusses audit issues and implications.
AB - SUMMARY: The concept of materiality has long been a basic feature in U.S. securities laws and regulations. With the current global and U.S. efforts to develop new disclosure standards for environmental, social, and governance, a debate has emerged regarding the expansion of the definition of materiality. An expanded definition would include not only financial materiality (i.e., how information affects an investor’s decision to buy or sell) but also environmental and social materiality (i.e., how a company’s operations impact the climate, its employees, consumers, and society). This is referred to as “double materiality” (European Union 2019). However, as discussed in this paper, the concept of materiality set forth in U.S. securities laws and court decisions are contrary to the concept of double materiality. This paper provides a brief history of materiality and expansion of the concept and discusses audit issues and implications.
KW - ESG
KW - audit issues
KW - double materiality
KW - materiality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159209267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2308/CIIA-2022-010
DO - 10.2308/CIIA-2022-010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159209267
SN - 1936-1270
VL - 17
SP - A50-A58
JO - Current Issues in Auditing
JF - Current Issues in Auditing
IS - 1
ER -