Further action toward valid science in Law and Human Behavior: Requiring open data, analytic code, and research materials

Bradley D. McAuliff, David DeMatteo, Jennifer Cox, Jennifer S. Hunt, Lora M. Levett, Kyle C. Scherr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In 2019, the inaugural editorial of Law and Human Behavior promised a measured approach to increasing transparency, openness, and replicability practices in the journal. Now, 3 years later, and on the brink of the present authors' last year as the editorial team, it seems only fitting that they take further action to bolster the validity of science published in the journal by requiring that authors openly report data, analytic code, and research materials. The purpose of this editorial is to briefly outline Law and Human Behavior's new requirements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-397
Number of pages3
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Further action toward valid science in Law and Human Behavior: Requiring open data, analytic code, and research materials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this