TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementing marine ecosystem-based management
T2 - Lessons from Australia
AU - Smith, David C.
AU - Fulton, Elizabeth A.
AU - Apfel, Petrina
AU - Cresswell, Ian D.
AU - Gillanders, Bronwyn M.
AU - Haward, Marcus
AU - Sainsbury, Keith J.
AU - Smith, Anthony D.M.
AU - Vince, Joanna
AU - Ward, Tim M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The review clearly identified that the waters around the Port of Gladstone are some of the most studied and regulated in Australia. Strategic planning of the port and its immediate surrounds had begun with the introduction of Australia’s National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development in 1992. This planning was squarely aimed at continued economic growth and port expansion, but also acknowledged the need for sustainable growth that incorporated environmental and social criteria (Gladstone Ports Corporation Limited, 2014). The first harbour monitoring programs were in place by 1994 and the port and individual industries continue to be administered under stringent emissions standards and reporting requirements, and investment by the individual sectors in advanced environmental monitoring as a basis for informed decision making. However, there was poor consideration of cumulative impacts and community confidence in the science used by the regulators was extremely low—community engagement was inconsistent, there were potential conflicts of interest among monitoring groups and some data withholding (Commonwealth of Australia, 2013). The Queensland Government responded to this by establishing the Gladstone Healthy Harbour Partnership (GHHP), which is supported by an Independent Science Panel (ISP).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is now widely accepted as the best means of managing the complex interactions in marine systems. However, progress towards implementing and operationalizing it has been slow. We take a pragmatic approach to EBM. Our simple definition is balancing human activities and environmental stewardship in a multiple-use context. In this paper, we present case studies on the development and implementation of EBM in Australia. The case studies (Australia's Ocean Policy, the Great Barrier Reef, New South Wales (NSW) marine estate, Gladstone Harbour, and South Australia and Spencer Gulf) span different spatial scales, from national to regional to local. They also cover different levels of governance or legislated mandate. We identify the key learnings, necessary components and future needs to support better implementation. These include requirements for clearly identified needs and objectives, stakeholder ownership, well defined governance frameworks, and scientific tools to deal with conflicts and trade-offs. Without all these components, multi-sector management will be difficult and there will be a tendency to maintain a focus on single sectors. While the need to manage individual sectors remains important and is often challenging, this alone will not necessarily ensure sustainable management of marine systems confronted by increasing cumulative impacts.
AB - Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is now widely accepted as the best means of managing the complex interactions in marine systems. However, progress towards implementing and operationalizing it has been slow. We take a pragmatic approach to EBM. Our simple definition is balancing human activities and environmental stewardship in a multiple-use context. In this paper, we present case studies on the development and implementation of EBM in Australia. The case studies (Australia's Ocean Policy, the Great Barrier Reef, New South Wales (NSW) marine estate, Gladstone Harbour, and South Australia and Spencer Gulf) span different spatial scales, from national to regional to local. They also cover different levels of governance or legislated mandate. We identify the key learnings, necessary components and future needs to support better implementation. These include requirements for clearly identified needs and objectives, stakeholder ownership, well defined governance frameworks, and scientific tools to deal with conflicts and trade-offs. Without all these components, multi-sector management will be difficult and there will be a tendency to maintain a focus on single sectors. While the need to manage individual sectors remains important and is often challenging, this alone will not necessarily ensure sustainable management of marine systems confronted by increasing cumulative impacts.
KW - Australia
KW - case studies
KW - ecosystem-based management
KW - implementation
KW - marine management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030660177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fsx113
DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsx113
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85030660177
SN - 1054-3139
VL - 74
SP - 1990
EP - 2003
JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science
JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science
IS - 7
ER -