TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving narrative production in children with language disorders
T2 - An early-stage efficacy study of a narrative intervention program
AU - Gillam, Sandra L.
AU - Olszewski, Abbie
AU - Squires, Katie
AU - Wolfe, Katie
AU - Slocum, Timothy
AU - Gillam, Ronald B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the Institute on Educational Sciences, National Center on Special Education Research (R324A100063). The authors thank Chad Bingham and Tami Pyfer for their assistance in carrying out this study and the Logan School District for allowing us access to the participants. Special thanks to Allison Hancock, Natalie Nelson Buttars, Julise Nelson, Casey Ragan, Brittany Martinez, Shannon Davenport, MaryAnn Hammond-Stenquist, Andrea Deakin, Sara Hicken, Ariel Hendrix, Sara Hegsted, Rebecca Mortensen, and Kelli Reese for collecting, transcribing, and coding the stories.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Purpose: As noted in this forum, more research is needed to support the work of school-based speech-language pathologists who are designing and implementing interventions for students with language disorders. This article presents the findings of a multiple-baseline, single-subject study that was conducted to assess the outcomes of an intervention designed to improve narrative discourse proficiency for children with language disorders. Method: Four school-age children with language disorders that included deficits in narration received an experimental version of a 3-phase narrative language intervention program called Supporting Knowledge in Language and Literacy (Gillam, Gillam, & Laing, 2014). Two additional children remained in baseline throughout the study and served as controls for history, testing, and maturation effects. Measures of story productivity (number of different words) and overall story complexity (Monitoring Indicators of Scholarly Language; Gillam, Gillam, Fargo, Olszewski, & Segura, 2016) were used to assess the children’s self-generated narratives. Results: After the onset of treatment, all 4 children who received the narrative intervention made moderate-to-large improvements in narrative productivity (number of different words). Three of the 4 children also made moderate-to-large improvements in narrative complexity (Monitoring Indicators of Scholarly Language). The narrative abilities of the 2 children who did not receive intervention did not change over the course of the study. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the feasibility of the Supporting Knowledge in Language and Literacy narrative instruction program for improving self-generated narratives by children with language disorders. Future research is needed to determine how gains in oral narration transfer to written narrative skills.
AB - Purpose: As noted in this forum, more research is needed to support the work of school-based speech-language pathologists who are designing and implementing interventions for students with language disorders. This article presents the findings of a multiple-baseline, single-subject study that was conducted to assess the outcomes of an intervention designed to improve narrative discourse proficiency for children with language disorders. Method: Four school-age children with language disorders that included deficits in narration received an experimental version of a 3-phase narrative language intervention program called Supporting Knowledge in Language and Literacy (Gillam, Gillam, & Laing, 2014). Two additional children remained in baseline throughout the study and served as controls for history, testing, and maturation effects. Measures of story productivity (number of different words) and overall story complexity (Monitoring Indicators of Scholarly Language; Gillam, Gillam, Fargo, Olszewski, & Segura, 2016) were used to assess the children’s self-generated narratives. Results: After the onset of treatment, all 4 children who received the narrative intervention made moderate-to-large improvements in narrative productivity (number of different words). Three of the 4 children also made moderate-to-large improvements in narrative complexity (Monitoring Indicators of Scholarly Language). The narrative abilities of the 2 children who did not receive intervention did not change over the course of the study. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the feasibility of the Supporting Knowledge in Language and Literacy narrative instruction program for improving self-generated narratives by children with language disorders. Future research is needed to determine how gains in oral narration transfer to written narrative skills.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045091668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0047
DO - 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0047
M3 - Article
C2 - 29621800
AN - SCOPUS:85045091668
VL - 49
SP - 197
EP - 212
JO - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
JF - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
SN - 0161-1461
IS - 2
ER -