Abstract
I argue for an extension of Clahsen's psycholinguistic paradigm to well- known languages with more complex morphological systems. This would help to address conceptual questions such as the nature of defaults and the way in which syncretisms are coded in the brain.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1040-1041 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1999 |