TY - JOUR
T1 - International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
AU - Marshak, Anthony R.
AU - Link, Jason S.
AU - Shuford, Rebecca
AU - Monaco, Mark E.
AU - Johannesen, Ellen
AU - Bianchi, Gabriella
AU - Anderson, M. Robin
AU - Olsen, Erik
AU - Smith, David C.
AU - Schmidt, Joern O.
AU - Dickey-Collas, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants' perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i.e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management.
AB - The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants' perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i.e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management.
KW - ecosystem approach to management
KW - ecosystem-based management
KW - multisector
KW - ocean use
KW - sector tradeoffs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020943684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
DO - 10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85020943684
SN - 1054-3139
VL - 74
SP - 414
EP - 420
JO - ICES Journal of Marine Science
JF - ICES Journal of Marine Science
IS - 1
ER -