Justice, social control, and social inequality: Framing the U.S. Juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose - This chapter harnesses Western conceptions of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and existing social inequalities to frame and fully understand the racial and ethnic disparities which constitute the U.S. juvenile justice system. Methodology/approach - Juvenile justice system disparities are framed within the theoretical contexts of Western conceptions of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and social inequality. The chapter's perspective is based on these concepts of justice, social control justifications, and evidence from scholarly research on juvenile justice system disparities. Findings - Overall, the U.S. juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities violate fundamental concepts of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and exacerbate existing social inequalities. Originality/value - Through its utilization of Western conceptions of justice and social control justifications, this chapter offers a relatively uniqueframework for the examination of the U.S. juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities. While recognizing the overall quality and significance of disparities research, the chapter asks the reader to take a step back, and look at and think about the broader justice and inequality contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-250
Number of pages14
JournalSociology of Crime Law and Deviance
Volume22
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Ethnicity
  • Juvenile justice
  • Race
  • Social control
  • Social inequality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Justice, social control, and social inequality: Framing the U.S. Juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this