TY - JOUR
T1 - Justice, social control, and social inequality
T2 - Framing the U.S. Juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities
AU - Smith, Brian J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 by Emerald Publishing Limited All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose - This chapter harnesses Western conceptions of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and existing social inequalities to frame and fully understand the racial and ethnic disparities which constitute the U.S. juvenile justice system. Methodology/approach - Juvenile justice system disparities are framed within the theoretical contexts of Western conceptions of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and social inequality. The chapter's perspective is based on these concepts of justice, social control justifications, and evidence from scholarly research on juvenile justice system disparities. Findings - Overall, the U.S. juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities violate fundamental concepts of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and exacerbate existing social inequalities. Originality/value - Through its utilization of Western conceptions of justice and social control justifications, this chapter offers a relatively uniqueframework for the examination of the U.S. juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities. While recognizing the overall quality and significance of disparities research, the chapter asks the reader to take a step back, and look at and think about the broader justice and inequality contexts.
AB - Purpose - This chapter harnesses Western conceptions of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and existing social inequalities to frame and fully understand the racial and ethnic disparities which constitute the U.S. juvenile justice system. Methodology/approach - Juvenile justice system disparities are framed within the theoretical contexts of Western conceptions of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and social inequality. The chapter's perspective is based on these concepts of justice, social control justifications, and evidence from scholarly research on juvenile justice system disparities. Findings - Overall, the U.S. juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities violate fundamental concepts of justice, traditional justifications of social control, and exacerbate existing social inequalities. Originality/value - Through its utilization of Western conceptions of justice and social control justifications, this chapter offers a relatively uniqueframework for the examination of the U.S. juvenile justice system's racial and ethnic disparities. While recognizing the overall quality and significance of disparities research, the chapter asks the reader to take a step back, and look at and think about the broader justice and inequality contexts.
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Juvenile justice
KW - Race
KW - Social control
KW - Social inequality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019672348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/S1521-613620170000022018
DO - 10.1108/S1521-613620170000022018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019672348
SN - 1521-6136
VL - 22
SP - 237
EP - 250
JO - Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance
JF - Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance
ER -