TY - JOUR
T1 - Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing
AU - Senkova, Olesya
AU - Otani, Hajime
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper is based on the first author’s dissertation submitted to Central Michigan University. We thank Bennett Schwartz and Abby Knoll for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - A judgment of leaning (JOL) has been investigated to understand self-regulated learning. However, asking participants to make JOLs may increase memory by creating a reactivity effect. In two experiments, we examined whether making JOLs would enhance memory by inducing item-specific processing. We compared a JOL task with two other tasks that are known to induce item-specific processing: pleasantness rating (Experiment 1) and single imagery (Experiment 2; creating vivid mental images). Participants learned a categorized or uncategorized list of words. Memory should be enhanced when the list promotes relational processing and the task induces item-specific processing. As expected, when the list was categorized, recall was higher in the JOL and item-specific processing conditions (pleasantness rating and single imagery) than in the control condition. Furthermore, recall was similar between the JOL and item-specific processing conditions. When the list was uncategorized, there was no difference in recall among the JOL, item-specific processing, and control conditions. Making JOLs enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing. We concluded that researchers need to carefully consider how making a JOL influences memory when investigating self-regulated study behaviors.
AB - A judgment of leaning (JOL) has been investigated to understand self-regulated learning. However, asking participants to make JOLs may increase memory by creating a reactivity effect. In two experiments, we examined whether making JOLs would enhance memory by inducing item-specific processing. We compared a JOL task with two other tasks that are known to induce item-specific processing: pleasantness rating (Experiment 1) and single imagery (Experiment 2; creating vivid mental images). Participants learned a categorized or uncategorized list of words. Memory should be enhanced when the list promotes relational processing and the task induces item-specific processing. As expected, when the list was categorized, recall was higher in the JOL and item-specific processing conditions (pleasantness rating and single imagery) than in the control condition. Furthermore, recall was similar between the JOL and item-specific processing conditions. When the list was uncategorized, there was no difference in recall among the JOL, item-specific processing, and control conditions. Making JOLs enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing. We concluded that researchers need to carefully consider how making a JOL influences memory when investigating self-regulated study behaviors.
KW - Item-specific processing
KW - Judgments of learning
KW - Relational processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098849103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13421-020-01133-2
DO - 10.3758/s13421-020-01133-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 33398785
AN - SCOPUS:85098849103
SN - 0090-502X
VL - 49
SP - 955
EP - 967
JO - Memory and Cognition
JF - Memory and Cognition
IS - 5
ER -