Manipulation, salience, and nudges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler recommend helping people make better decisions by employing ‘nudges’, which they define as noncoercive methods of influencing choice for the better. Not surprisingly, healthcare practitioners and public policy professionals have become interested in whether nudges might be a promising method of improving health-related behaviors without resorting to heavy-handed methods such as coercion, deception, or government regulation. Many nudges seem unobjectionable as they merely improve the quality and quantity available for the decision-maker. However, other nudges influence decision-making in ways that do not involve providing more and better information. Nudges of this sort raise concerns about manipulation. This paper will focus on non informational nudges that operate by changing the salience of various options. It will survey two approaches to understanding manipulation, one which sees manipulation as a kind of pressure, and one that sees it as a kind of trickery. On the pressure view, salience nudges do not appear to be manipulative. However, on the trickery view (which the author favors), salience nudges will be manipulative if they increase the salience so that it is disproportionate to that fact’s true relevance and importance for the decision at hand. By contrast, salience nudges will not be manipulative if they merely highlight some fact that is true and important for the decision at hand. The paper concludes by providing examples of both manipulative and non manipulative salience nudges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-170
Number of pages7
JournalBioethics
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Manipulation
  • Nudges
  • Salience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Manipulation, salience, and nudges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this