Measuring music conducting from multiple perspectives: Mixed-method validity analysis of a six-function theory and survey

Alan J Gumm

Measuring music conducting from multiple perspectives: Mixed-method validity analysis of a six-function theory and survey

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

The study tested the validity of the Conducting Priorities Survey. CPS with concise wording showed minimally adequate reliabilities, whereas a CPS with clarified wording and updated content produced robust reliabilities. Evidence convincingly yet tentatively support the content, construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of the CPS.

Original language	English
State	Published - Jan 2015
Event	Michigan Music Conference Research Symposium - Grand Rapids, MI Duration: Jan 1 2015 → Jan 31 2015

Conference

Conference	Michigan Music Conference Research Symposium
Period	01/1/15 → 01/31/15

Cite this

@conference{67e1ed56bfb24ea3802d2f46f1820991,

title = "Measuring music conducting from multiple perspectives: Mixed-method validity analysis of a six-function theory and survey",

abstract = "The study tested the validity of the Conducting Priorities Survey. CPS with concise wording showed minimally adequate reliabilities, whereas a CPS with clarified wording and updated content produced robust reliabilities. Evidence convincingly yet tentatively support the content, construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of the CPS.",

author = "Gumm, {Alan J}",

year = "2015",

month = jan,

language = "English",

note = "null ; Conference date: 01-01-2015 Through 31-01-2015",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Measuring music conducting from multiple perspectives: Mixed-method validity analysis of a six-function theory and survey

AU - Gumm, Alan J

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - The study tested the validity of the Conducting Priorities Survey. CPS with concise wording showed minimally adequate reliabilities, whereas a CPS with clarified wording and updated content produced robust reliabilities. Evidence convincingly yet tentatively support the content, construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of the CPS.

AB - The study tested the validity of the Conducting Priorities Survey. CPS with concise wording showed minimally adequate reliabilities, whereas a CPS with clarified wording and updated content produced robust reliabilities. Evidence convincingly yet tentatively support the content, construct, concurrent, and predictive validity of the CPS.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 1 January 2015 through 31 January 2015

ER -

Measuring music conducting from multiple perspectives: Mixed-method validity analysis of a six-function theory and survey

Abstract

Conference

Fingerprint

Cite this