Merit Principles Merit Further Investigation: The Influence on Employee Perception of Whistleblowing

Sanghee Park, So Hee Jeon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Merit principles have been fundamental to managing human resources for several decades in public administration. However, the meaning of merit and its relationship with other values needs more attention from the scholarship. This study investigates how three components of merit principles, i.e., tenure protection, merit-based hiring, and merit-based rewards, affect government employees in different ways by focusing on their willingness to report wrongdoings. This study finds from the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey that tenure protection is a significant positive predictor of whistleblowing, and its negative marginal effect turns to positive when employees perceive their tenures are well protected. However, their willingness to blow the whistle is less related to merit-based hiring, while merit-based rewards have a positive effect on whistleblowing despite the ambiguous expectation in the literature. Employee empowerment, trust in management, and ethical leadership consistently increase the probability of whistleblowing. This study finds no evidence of interagency differences.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

Keywords

  • Merit principles
  • U.S. federal agencies
  • merit-based hiring
  • pay-for-performance
  • tenure protection
  • whistleblowing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Merit Principles Merit Further Investigation: The Influence on Employee Perception of Whistleblowing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this