@inbook{eaac98329baa4bbf89ae447c5be752c4,
title = "Morphomes all the way down!",
abstract = "Taking Stump's (2016) PFM2 C(ontent)/F(orm)/R(ealized) paradigm distinction I argue that the F/R-paradigm features are conceptually different from C-paradigm features. C-paradigm features interface with syntax/semantics, hence are 'interpretable'. F-paradigm features, by contrast, induce purely formal (morphomic) partitionings (cf. Boy{\'e} & Schalchli 2019), even for canonical systems (one:one Content-Form correspondence), a reflection of the true autonomy of inflectional morphology, 'morphology-by-itself '. The C-paradigm features are a subset of Sadler & Spencer's (2001) 's(yntactic)-features'. Canonical Content-Form correspondence is achieved by typing features as m- and s-features.",
keywords = "Content paradigm, Form paradigm, Inflectional paradigm, M-feature, Morphology-by-itself, Morphome, Morphomic feature, Paradigm Function Morphology, S-feature",
author = "Andrew Spencer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 John Benjamins Publishing Company.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1075/cilt.353.13spe",
language = "English",
series = "Current Issues in Linguistic Theory",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
pages = "239--254",
editor = "Sedigheh Moradi and Marcia Haag and Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic",
booktitle = "All Things Morphology",
}