TY - JOUR
T1 - National audit of the recent utilization of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Canada
T2 - 2003 to 2004
AU - Forbes, Thomas L.
AU - Lawlor, D. Kirk
AU - DeRose, Guy
AU - Harris, Kenneth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Presently, a major deterrent to the increased adoption of the endovascular approach in Canada is inadequate financial support from the government-controlled health plan. Both academic and nonacademic centers are allocated operating budgets from which allocation of these limited resources ensues. Funding for EVAR across Canada is variable and often limited, as the additional graft costs (approximately $10,000 per patient) associated with this procedure 20 are allocated to a hospital’s global operating budget. Unlike in the United States, 21 most Canadian hospitals have allotted a fixed dollar amount or case volume to EVAR, which can negatively impact a hospital’s operating budget. These case-volume restrictions are partially responsible for the continued restriction of EVAR to higher-risk patients.
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - Objectives: Worldwide, increasing proportions of aortic aneurysms are repaired electively via the endovascular route. The purpose of this study was to report the recent utilization of endovascular repair in Canada by reviewing a national administrative database. Methods: The Canadian Institute for Health Information database (a collection of all acute care hospitalizations) was reviewed to identify patients who received nonemergent repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004. During this 1-year period, differentiation between endovascular (EVAR) and open repair was possible using ICD-10-CA procedural codes in eight of ten provinces. Case volumes, patient age, length of hospitalization, and mortality were stratified by method of repair, province, and size and teaching status of hospitals. Results: In this 1-year period, 1996 patients in eight provinces (representing 72% of Canada's population) underwent open repair (n = 1818, 91.1%) or EVAR (n = 178, 8.9%) of a nonruptured AAA. National utilization rates were 8.4 and 0.8 per 100,000 population for open repair and EVAR. These rates were more constant for EVAR (0 to 1.3) then for open repair (4 to 18.3) when analyzed on a provincial basis. Mean patient age did not differ between EVAR and open repair (73.7 vs 71.9 years, P = 0.4) while mean length of stay (5.8 vs 11.9 days, P = 0.03) and in-hospital mortality (0.6% vs 4.6%, P = .025) were significantly lower for EVAR than for open repair. Most EVAR (96%) and more than half of open repairs (56%) were performed in academic teaching centers. Conclusions: Although EVAR results in significant reductions in length of hospitalization and early mortality, it continues to be underutilized in Canada compared with other national reports involving administrative databases.
AB - Objectives: Worldwide, increasing proportions of aortic aneurysms are repaired electively via the endovascular route. The purpose of this study was to report the recent utilization of endovascular repair in Canada by reviewing a national administrative database. Methods: The Canadian Institute for Health Information database (a collection of all acute care hospitalizations) was reviewed to identify patients who received nonemergent repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2004. During this 1-year period, differentiation between endovascular (EVAR) and open repair was possible using ICD-10-CA procedural codes in eight of ten provinces. Case volumes, patient age, length of hospitalization, and mortality were stratified by method of repair, province, and size and teaching status of hospitals. Results: In this 1-year period, 1996 patients in eight provinces (representing 72% of Canada's population) underwent open repair (n = 1818, 91.1%) or EVAR (n = 178, 8.9%) of a nonruptured AAA. National utilization rates were 8.4 and 0.8 per 100,000 population for open repair and EVAR. These rates were more constant for EVAR (0 to 1.3) then for open repair (4 to 18.3) when analyzed on a provincial basis. Mean patient age did not differ between EVAR and open repair (73.7 vs 71.9 years, P = 0.4) while mean length of stay (5.8 vs 11.9 days, P = 0.03) and in-hospital mortality (0.6% vs 4.6%, P = .025) were significantly lower for EVAR than for open repair. Most EVAR (96%) and more than half of open repairs (56%) were performed in academic teaching centers. Conclusions: Although EVAR results in significant reductions in length of hospitalization and early mortality, it continues to be underutilized in Canada compared with other national reports involving administrative databases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24944544753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.043
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 16171580
AN - SCOPUS:24944544753
VL - 42
SP - 410
EP - 414
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery
SN - 0741-5214
IS - 3
ER -