On the validity of implicit association measures of personality traits

Brian P. Siers, Neil D. Christiansen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Participants (N = 200) completed self-report and implicit association (IAT) measures of Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability. Peer trait ratings and supervisor ratings of job performance were also collected. Results suggested low convergence between IAT and self-report trait measures. Cognitive ability and self-positive bias both explained significant portions of the method variance expressed by IAT measures. Correlations between IAT trait measures and job performance were statistically non-significant, of similar magnitudes to their self-report counterparts, and of magnitudes consistent with past research on criterion validities of self-report trait measures. The results offer only very limited support for the use of IAT trait measures in applied assessment settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)361-366
Number of pages6
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 2013


  • Construct validity
  • Criterion validity
  • Five factor model
  • Implicit Association Test
  • Implicit measurement
  • Personality
  • Personnel section


Dive into the research topics of 'On the validity of implicit association measures of personality traits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this