Privacy please? A comparison between self-checkout and book checkout desk circulation rates for lgbt and other books

Stephanie Mathson, Jeffrey Hancks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Improving library technologies allow patrons greater autonomy. One such technology, self-checkout kiosks, puts patrons in virtual control over their circulation experience. Whereas previously patrons had to approach circulation staff to check out, now this can be done privately. The impact self-checkout has on the circulation of potentially embarrassing or controversial materials is unknown. In this study, select lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) and non-LGBT materials at Central Michigan University’s Park Library were anonymously tracked for one academic year to determine if they circulated via selfcheck or the traditional circulation desk. LGBT materials circulated twenty percent more via self-check, indicating that patrons appreciated the machines’ privacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-37
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Access Services
Volume4
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 27 2007

Keywords

  • Circulation statistics
  • Controversial materials
  • LGBT studies
  • Library automation
  • Library technologies
  • Patron privacy
  • Self-checkout

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Privacy please? A comparison between self-checkout and book checkout desk circulation rates for lgbt and other books'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this