TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying pollutant loading from channel sources
T2 - Watershed-scale application of the River Erosion Model
AU - Lammers, Roderick W.
AU - Bledsoe, Brian P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was partially funded by the National Science Foundation , Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) [Grant No. DBE-0966346 ] ‘I-WATER: Integrated Water, Atmosphere, Ecosystems Education and Research Program’ at Colorado State University. Additional funding was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [grant RD835570 ]. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the grantee and do not necessarily represent the official view of the USEPA. Further, USEPA does not endorse the purchase of any commercial products or services mentioned in the publication. The Urban Drainage and Flood Control District and members of the Big Dry Creek Watershed Association provided funding for field work on Big Dry Creek. We are grateful to Travis Hardee and Travis Stroth who assisted with the field data collection. We also want to thank Peter Nelson for providing guidance on model development and Mazdak Arabi, Sara Rathburn, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript. Jane Clary and Sandi Wilbur were excellent resources on Big Dry Creek and Lick Creek, respectively. Bank phosphorus data from both watersheds and additional information on model application and results are available in the “ Supplementary Material ”. The River Erosion Model (including all source code) is available at www.github.com/rodlammers/REM .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/3/15
Y1 - 2019/3/15
N2 - Phosphorus and fine sediment pollution are primary causes of water quality degradation. Streambank erosion is a potentially significant source of fine sediment and particulate phosphorus to watersheds, but it remains difficult to quantify the magnitude of this loading. A new, easily applied, watershed scale model was used to simulate the potential for future phosphorus and sediment loading from channel erosion in two watersheds: Big Dry Creek, Colorado and Lick Creek, North Carolina. The projected magnitude of loading for phosphorus is about an order of magnitude higher in Big Dry Creek compared to Lick Creek (∼280 kg/yr and ∼50 kg/yr, respectively), while sediment loading results are similar (∼950 ton/yr). In both watersheds, model results suggest that channel erosion will not contribute a significant amount of phosphorus to the watershed (∼1–4% of historic watershed total from all pollutant sources) but will contribute a large amount of sediment (30–100% of historic watershed total). Uncertainty in these estimates is high, but quantifying confidence in model projections is important for understanding and using model results. Importantly, modeling shows no decrease in loading over the 40-year model time frame in either watershed, suggesting that the channels are not adjusting to a new stable state and erosion will continue to be a pollutant source. Lick Creek model results are sensitive to upstream sediment supply while Big Dry Creek's are not, reinforcing the importance of considering alterations to both the hydrologic and sediment regimes when analyzing potential channel changes — at least in vertically active channels. This new modeling approach is useful for estimating historic and future phosphorus and sediment loading from channel erosion, an important first step in effective management to improve water quality.
AB - Phosphorus and fine sediment pollution are primary causes of water quality degradation. Streambank erosion is a potentially significant source of fine sediment and particulate phosphorus to watersheds, but it remains difficult to quantify the magnitude of this loading. A new, easily applied, watershed scale model was used to simulate the potential for future phosphorus and sediment loading from channel erosion in two watersheds: Big Dry Creek, Colorado and Lick Creek, North Carolina. The projected magnitude of loading for phosphorus is about an order of magnitude higher in Big Dry Creek compared to Lick Creek (∼280 kg/yr and ∼50 kg/yr, respectively), while sediment loading results are similar (∼950 ton/yr). In both watersheds, model results suggest that channel erosion will not contribute a significant amount of phosphorus to the watershed (∼1–4% of historic watershed total from all pollutant sources) but will contribute a large amount of sediment (30–100% of historic watershed total). Uncertainty in these estimates is high, but quantifying confidence in model projections is important for understanding and using model results. Importantly, modeling shows no decrease in loading over the 40-year model time frame in either watershed, suggesting that the channels are not adjusting to a new stable state and erosion will continue to be a pollutant source. Lick Creek model results are sensitive to upstream sediment supply while Big Dry Creek's are not, reinforcing the importance of considering alterations to both the hydrologic and sediment regimes when analyzing potential channel changes — at least in vertically active channels. This new modeling approach is useful for estimating historic and future phosphorus and sediment loading from channel erosion, an important first step in effective management to improve water quality.
KW - Model uncertainty
KW - Phosphorus pollution
KW - Sediment pollution
KW - Stream restoration
KW - Water quality management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059478584&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.074
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.074
M3 - Article
C2 - 30616182
AN - SCOPUS:85059478584
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 234
SP - 104
EP - 114
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
ER -