Racial prototypicality, affirmative action, and hiring decisions in a multiracial world

Stephen M. Colarelli, Debra A. Poole, Kate Unterborn, Geeta C. D'Souza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


This research examined how the racial prototypicality of minority job applicants' faces influenced hiring decisions under different affirmative action (AA) policies: no AA, soft AA (recruitment of minorities with merit-based hiring), and hard AA (race as a tie-break factor in hiring). Participants (N=252) evaluated resume/photograph pairs, each containing a Caucasian and a Black applicant, with minority applicants representing three levels of racial prototypicality. The number of jobs awarded to minorities increased as Black racial prototypicality increased. Each level of AA policy strength increased the number of minority hires, but these increases came with a price: AA directives decreased the percentage of minority hires attributed to higher qualifications and increased perceptions that hires were due to AA more than was actually the case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-173
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Racial prototypicality, affirmative action, and hiring decisions in a multiracial world'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this