TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing Computed Tomography Scan Utilization for Pediatric Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department
T2 - A Quality Improvement Initiative
AU - Arora, Rajan
AU - White, Emily N.
AU - Niedbala, Deborah
AU - Ravichandran, Yagnaram
AU - Sethuraman, Usha
AU - Radovic, Nancy
AU - Watson, Kristin
AU - Nypaver, Michele
N1 - Funding Information:
The Michigan Emergency Department Improvement Collaborative (MEDIC) relies on the dedication, diligence, and passion of a diverse set of partners. First we recognize all of the site abstractors who, with their enthusiasm and industry, provide the critical data that advance MEDIC’s QI efforts. Second, we acknowledge all the clinical physician champions (who are not co-authors on this manuscript) for their perseverance in performing the hard work of changing practice for the betterment of children visiting EDs throughout Michigan. Finally, we recognize the tremendous daily commitment, energy, and devotion of the MEDIC coordinating center staff, in successfully transforming vision into action: Jason Ham, Andrew Scott, Carrie Smith, Emily White, Megan Hogikyan, Alyson Stone, and Christie Radden.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: The validated Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules are meant to aid clinicians in safely reducing unwarranted imaging in children with minor head injuries (MHI). Even so, computed tomography (CT) scan utilization remains high, especially in intermediate-risk (per PECARN) MHI patients. The primary objective of this quality improvement initiative was to reduce CT utilization rates in the intermediate-risk MHI patients. Methods: This project was conducted in a Level I trauma pediatric emergency department (ED). Children < 18 years evaluated for intermediate-risk MHI from June 2016 through July 2019 were included. Our key drivers were provider education, decision support, and performance feedback. Our primary outcome was change in head CT utilization rate (%). Balancing measures included return visit within 72 hours of the index visit, ED length of stay (LOS), and clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) on the revisit. We used statistical process control methodology to assess head CT rates over time. Results: A total of 1,535 eligible intermediate-risk MHI patients were analyzed. Our intervention bundle was associated with a decrease in CT use from 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.5% to 22.5%) in the preintervention period to 13.9% (95% CI = 13.8% to 14.1%) in the postintervention period, an absolute reduction of 4.6% (p = 0.015). Over time, no difference was noted in either ED LOS or return visit rate. There was only one revisit with a ciTBI to our institution during the study period. Conclusions: Our multifaceted quality improvement initiative was both safe and effective in reducing our CT utilization rates in children with intermediate-risk MHI.
AB - Background: The validated Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rules are meant to aid clinicians in safely reducing unwarranted imaging in children with minor head injuries (MHI). Even so, computed tomography (CT) scan utilization remains high, especially in intermediate-risk (per PECARN) MHI patients. The primary objective of this quality improvement initiative was to reduce CT utilization rates in the intermediate-risk MHI patients. Methods: This project was conducted in a Level I trauma pediatric emergency department (ED). Children < 18 years evaluated for intermediate-risk MHI from June 2016 through July 2019 were included. Our key drivers were provider education, decision support, and performance feedback. Our primary outcome was change in head CT utilization rate (%). Balancing measures included return visit within 72 hours of the index visit, ED length of stay (LOS), and clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) on the revisit. We used statistical process control methodology to assess head CT rates over time. Results: A total of 1,535 eligible intermediate-risk MHI patients were analyzed. Our intervention bundle was associated with a decrease in CT use from 18.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14.5% to 22.5%) in the preintervention period to 13.9% (95% CI = 13.8% to 14.1%) in the postintervention period, an absolute reduction of 4.6% (p = 0.015). Over time, no difference was noted in either ED LOS or return visit rate. There was only one revisit with a ciTBI to our institution during the study period. Conclusions: Our multifaceted quality improvement initiative was both safe and effective in reducing our CT utilization rates in children with intermediate-risk MHI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098079653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acem.14177
DO - 10.1111/acem.14177
M3 - Article
C2 - 33368815
AN - SCOPUS:85098079653
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 28
SP - 655
EP - 665
JO - Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 6
ER -