Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)

D. Stephen Lindsay, Amina Memon, Debra A. Poole, Ray Bull

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We respond to comments by Pope regarding research by Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull. Pope called on psychologists to "scrutinize the assumptions" underlying our research on the grounds that the findings were reported inappropriately, there was no plan to control for Type I errors, and the sample was too small. We rebut each of these criticisms and clarify the findings and conclusions offered by Poole et al.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-365
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Keywords

  • Psychotherapists
  • Recovered memories
  • Sexual abuse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this