Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)

D. Stephen Lindsay; Amina Memon; Debra A. Poole; Ray Bull

doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00090.x

Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)

D. Stephen Lindsay, Amina Memon, Debra A. Poole, Ray Bull

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

We respond to comments by Pope regarding research by Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull. Pope called on psychologists to "scrutinize the assumptions" underlying our research on the grounds that the findings were reported inappropriately, there was no plan to control for Type I errors, and the sample was too small. We rebut each of these criticisms and clarify the findings and conclusions offered by Poole et al.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	363-365
Number of pages	3
Journal	Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Volume	3
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00090.x
State	Published - 1996

Keywords

Psychotherapists
Recovered memories
Sexual abuse

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00090.x

Cite this

@article{b81aa2466e7c46f99469d13267338d55,

title = "Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)",

abstract = "We respond to comments by Pope regarding research by Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull. Pope called on psychologists to {"}scrutinize the assumptions{"} underlying our research on the grounds that the findings were reported inappropriately, there was no plan to control for Type I errors, and the sample was too small. We rebut each of these criticisms and clarify the findings and conclusions offered by Poole et al.",

keywords = "Psychotherapists, Recovered memories, Sexual abuse",

author = "Lindsay, {D. Stephen} and Amina Memon and Poole, {Debra A.} and Ray Bull",

year = "1996",

doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00090.x",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "363--365",

journal = "Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice",

issn = "0969-5893",

publisher = "Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)

AU - Lindsay, D. Stephen

AU - Memon, Amina

AU - Poole, Debra A.

AU - Bull, Ray

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - We respond to comments by Pope regarding research by Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull. Pope called on psychologists to "scrutinize the assumptions" underlying our research on the grounds that the findings were reported inappropriately, there was no plan to control for Type I errors, and the sample was too small. We rebut each of these criticisms and clarify the findings and conclusions offered by Poole et al.

AB - We respond to comments by Pope regarding research by Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull. Pope called on psychologists to "scrutinize the assumptions" underlying our research on the grounds that the findings were reported inappropriately, there was no plan to control for Type I errors, and the sample was too small. We rebut each of these criticisms and clarify the findings and conclusions offered by Poole et al.

KW - Psychotherapists

KW - Recovered memories

KW - Sexual abuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042919453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00090.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2850.1996.tb00090.x

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:3042919453

SN - 0969-5893

VL - 3

SP - 363

EP - 365

JO - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

JF - Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

IS - 4

ER -

Rejoinder to Pope's (1995) comments regarding Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this