Abstract
Objective: Examine thermocouple model uncertainty (reliability + validity). Design: First, a 3 x 3 repeated measures design with independent variables electrothermometers and thermocouple model. Second, a 1 x 3 repeated measures design with independent variable subprobe. Intervention: Three electrothermometers, 3 thermocouple models, a multi-sensor probe and a mercury thermometer measured a stable water bath. Main Outcome Measures: Temperature and absolute temperature differences between thermocouples and a mercury thermometer. Results: Thermocouple uncertainty was greater than manufactures' claims. For all thermocouple models, validity and reliability were better in the Iso-Themex than the Datalogger, but there were no practical differences between models within an electrothermometers. Validity of multi-sensor probes and thermocouples within a probe were not different but were greater than manufacturers' claims. Reliability of multiprobes and thermocouples within a probe were within manufacturers claims. Conclusion: Thermocouple models vary in reliability and validity. Scientists should test and report the uncertainty of their equipment rather than depending on manufactures' claims.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 50-59 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Sport Rehabilitation |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2008 |
Keywords
- Measurement
- Temperature
- Therapeutic modality research
- Uncertainty