Reliability and validity of electrothermometers and associated thermocouples

Lisa S. Jutte, Kenneth L. Knight, Blaine C. Long

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Examine thermocouple model uncertainty (reliability + validity). Design: First, a 3 x 3 repeated measures design with independent variables electrothermometers and thermocouple model. Second, a 1 x 3 repeated measures design with independent variable subprobe. Intervention: Three electrothermometers, 3 thermocouple models, a multi-sensor probe and a mercury thermometer measured a stable water bath. Main Outcome Measures: Temperature and absolute temperature differences between thermocouples and a mercury thermometer. Results: Thermocouple uncertainty was greater than manufactures' claims. For all thermocouple models, validity and reliability were better in the Iso-Themex than the Datalogger, but there were no practical differences between models within an electrothermometers. Validity of multi-sensor probes and thermocouples within a probe were not different but were greater than manufacturers' claims. Reliability of multiprobes and thermocouples within a probe were within manufacturers claims. Conclusion: Thermocouple models vary in reliability and validity. Scientists should test and report the uncertainty of their equipment rather than depending on manufactures' claims.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-59
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Sport Rehabilitation
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2008

Keywords

  • Measurement
  • Temperature
  • Therapeutic modality research
  • Uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of electrothermometers and associated thermocouples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this