Renorming labour law: Can we escape labour laws recurring regulatory dilemmas?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Historically, protective labour law pushed back against capitalist labour markets by facilitating workers' collective action and setting minimum employment standards based on social norms. Although the possibilities, limits and desirability of such a project were viewed differently in classical, Marxist and pluralist political economy, each perspective understood that the pursuit of protective labour law would produce recurring regulatory dilemmas requiring trade-offs between efficiency, equity and voice and/or between workers' and employers' interests. Recently, some scholars have argued that labour law needs to be renormed in ways that are market constituting rather than market constraining and that this change would avoid regulatory dilemmas. This article reviews the concept of regulatory dilemmas as formulated in the three major traditions of labour law scholarship, critically assesses recent work by Deakin and Wilkinson and by Hyde that proposes to renorm labour law and overcome regulatory dilemmas and proposes an alternative approach to understanding regulatory dilemmas based on the work of Wright.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberdwq001
Pages (from-to)99-138
Number of pages40
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Renorming labour law: Can we escape labour laws recurring regulatory dilemmas?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this