TY - JOUR
T1 - Sampling a littoral fish assemblage
T2 - Comparison of small-mesh fyke netting and boat electrofishing
AU - Ruetz, Carl R.
AU - Uzarski, Donald G.
AU - Krueger, Damon M.
AU - Rutherford, Edward S.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank B. Biddanda, M. Breen, J. Conzelmann, C. Diana, J. Hansen, L. Nemeth, A. Parker, M. Ogdahl, J. Roberts, D. Ruberg, D. VanHaitsma, and E. Vannoy for assistance with field sampling. M. Cooper, A. Steinman, M. Hansen, and four anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This research is a component of the Muskegon Lake Long-Term Monitoring Project, which is supported by the Muskegon Lake Research Endowment Fund managed by the Community Foundation for Muskegon County. A. Steinman was instrumental in establishing the Muskegon Lake Long-Term Monitoring Project.
PY - 2007/8
Y1 - 2007/8
N2 - We compared small-mesh (4-mm) fyke netting and boat electrofishing for sampling a littoral fish assemblage in Muskegon Lake, Michigan. We hypothesized that fyke netting selects for small-bodied fishes and electrofishing selects for large-bodied fishes. Three sites were sampled during May (2004 and 2005), July (2005 only), and September (2004 and 2005). We found that the species composition of captured fish differed considerably between fyke netting and electrofishing based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Species strongly associated with fyke netting (based on NMDS and relative abundance) included the brook silverside Labidestkes sicculus, banded killifish Fundulus diaphanus, round goby Neogobius melanostomus, mimic shiner Notropis volucellus, and bluntnose minnow Pimephales notatus, whereas species associated with electrofishing included the Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, catostomids (Moxostoma spp. and Catostomus spp.), freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens, walleye Sander vitreus, gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum, and common carp Cyprinus carpio. The total length of fish captured by electrofishing was 12.8 cm (95% confidence interval = 5.5-17.2 cm) greater than that of fish captured by fyke netting. Size selectivity of the gears contributed to differences in species composition of the fish captured, supporting our initial hypothesis. Thus, small-mesh fyke nets and boat electrofishers provided complementary information on a littoral fish assemblage. Our results support use of multiple gear types in monitoring and research surveys of fish assemblages.
AB - We compared small-mesh (4-mm) fyke netting and boat electrofishing for sampling a littoral fish assemblage in Muskegon Lake, Michigan. We hypothesized that fyke netting selects for small-bodied fishes and electrofishing selects for large-bodied fishes. Three sites were sampled during May (2004 and 2005), July (2005 only), and September (2004 and 2005). We found that the species composition of captured fish differed considerably between fyke netting and electrofishing based on nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Species strongly associated with fyke netting (based on NMDS and relative abundance) included the brook silverside Labidestkes sicculus, banded killifish Fundulus diaphanus, round goby Neogobius melanostomus, mimic shiner Notropis volucellus, and bluntnose minnow Pimephales notatus, whereas species associated with electrofishing included the Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, catostomids (Moxostoma spp. and Catostomus spp.), freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens, walleye Sander vitreus, gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum, and common carp Cyprinus carpio. The total length of fish captured by electrofishing was 12.8 cm (95% confidence interval = 5.5-17.2 cm) greater than that of fish captured by fyke netting. Size selectivity of the gears contributed to differences in species composition of the fish captured, supporting our initial hypothesis. Thus, small-mesh fyke nets and boat electrofishers provided complementary information on a littoral fish assemblage. Our results support use of multiple gear types in monitoring and research surveys of fish assemblages.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36649015181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1577/M06-147.1
DO - 10.1577/M06-147.1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:36649015181
SN - 0275-5947
VL - 27
SP - 825
EP - 831
JO - North American Journal of Fisheries Management
JF - North American Journal of Fisheries Management
IS - 3
ER -