Abstract
In March 2017, the Supreme Court decided Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association and upheld the constitutionality of agency fees for nonunion teachers. We examine how Friedrichs reflects a host of issues grouped around a patchwork of ideological commitments regarding teachers unions and public-sector unions more generally, partisan politics, and empirically oriented claims about the impact of teachers unions on students’ educational opportunities. We particularly argue that the case reflects a tension between judicial, scientific, and democratic decision-making, and that courts and reformers should be sensitive to this tension as they consider similar cases moving forward.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 211-233 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Educational Policy |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1 2018 |
Keywords
- collective bargaining
- education law
- labor relations
- legal analysis
- unions