Science and Politics in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association

Benjamin Michael Superfine, Regina R. Umpstead, David Mayrowetz, Sarah Winchell Lenhoff, Ben Pogodzinski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


In March 2017, the Supreme Court decided Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association and upheld the constitutionality of agency fees for nonunion teachers. We examine how Friedrichs reflects a host of issues grouped around a patchwork of ideological commitments regarding teachers unions and public-sector unions more generally, partisan politics, and empirically oriented claims about the impact of teachers unions on students’ educational opportunities. We particularly argue that the case reflects a tension between judicial, scientific, and democratic decision-making, and that courts and reformers should be sensitive to this tension as they consider similar cases moving forward.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-233
Number of pages23
JournalEducational Policy
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018


  • collective bargaining
  • education law
  • labor relations
  • legal analysis
  • unions


Dive into the research topics of 'Science and Politics in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this