Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma

David P. Crabb, Ananth C. Viswanathan, Andrew I. McNaught, Darmalingum Poinoosawmy, Frederick W. Fitzke, Roger A. Hitchings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

65 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims - To simulate the central binocular visual field using results from merged left and right monocular Humphrey fields. To assess the agreement between the simulation and the binocular Humphrey Esterman visual field test (EVFT). Method - 59 consecutive patients with bilateral glaucoma each recorded Humphrey 24-2 fields for both eyes and binocular EVFT on the same visit. EVFT results were used to identify patients exhibiting at least one defect (< 10 dB) within the central 20°of the binocular field. This criterion is relevant to a patient's legal fitness to drive in the UK. Individual sensitivity values from monocular fields are merged to generate a simulated central binocular field. Results are displayed as a grey scale and as symbols representing defects at the < 10 dB level. Agreement between patients failing the criterion using the simulation and the EVFT was evaluated. Results - Substantial agreement was observed between the methods in classifying patients with at least one defect (< 10 dB) within the central binocular field (kappa 0.81; SE 0.09). Patients failing this criterion using the EVFT results were identified by the binocular simulation with high levels of sensitivity (100%) and specificity (86%). Conclusions - Excellent agreement exists between the simulated binocular results and EVFT in classifying glaucomatous patients with central binocular defects. A rapid estimate of a patient's central binocular field and visual functional capacity can be ascertained without extra perimetric examination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1236-1241
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume82
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this