TY - JOUR
T1 - Statewide Differences in Personality Associated with Geographic Disparities in Access to Palliative Care
T2 - Findings on Openness
AU - Hoerger, Michael
AU - Perry, Laura M.
AU - Korotkin, Brittany D.
AU - Walsh, Leah E.
AU - Kazan, Adina S.
AU - Rogers, James L.
AU - Atiya, Wasef
AU - Malhotra, Sonia
AU - Gerhart, James I.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104940) of the National Institutes of Health (U.S.). The authors conducted the research independently from the funder.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Background: Geographic disparities in access to palliative care cause unnecessary suffering near the end-of-life in low-access U.S. states. The psychological mechanisms accounting for state-level variation are poorly understood. Objective: To examine whether statewide differences in personality account for variation in palliative care access. Design: We combined 5 state-level datasets that included the 50 states and national capital. Palliative care access was measured by the Center to Advance Palliative Care 2015 state-by-state report card. State-level personality differences in openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, and extraversion were identified in a report on 619,387 adults. The Census and Gallup provided covariate data. Regression analyses examined whether state-level personality predicted state-level palliative care access, controlling for population size, age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and political views. Sensitivity analyses controlled for rurality, nonprofit status, and hospital size. Results: Palliative care access was higher in states that were older, less racially diverse, higher in socioeconomic status, more liberal, and, as hypothesized, higher in openness. In regression analyses accounting for all predictors and covariates, higher openness continued to account for better state-level access to palliative care (β = 0.428, p = 0.008). Agreeableness also emerged as predicting better access. In sensitivity analyses, personality findings persisted, and less rural states and those with more nonprofits had better access. Conclusions: Palliative care access is worse in states lower in openness, meaning where residents are more skeptical, traditional, and concrete. Personality theory offers recommendations for palliative care advocates communicating with administrators, legislators, philanthropists, and patients to expand access in low-openness states.
AB - Background: Geographic disparities in access to palliative care cause unnecessary suffering near the end-of-life in low-access U.S. states. The psychological mechanisms accounting for state-level variation are poorly understood. Objective: To examine whether statewide differences in personality account for variation in palliative care access. Design: We combined 5 state-level datasets that included the 50 states and national capital. Palliative care access was measured by the Center to Advance Palliative Care 2015 state-by-state report card. State-level personality differences in openness, conscientiousness, agreeableness, neuroticism, and extraversion were identified in a report on 619,387 adults. The Census and Gallup provided covariate data. Regression analyses examined whether state-level personality predicted state-level palliative care access, controlling for population size, age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and political views. Sensitivity analyses controlled for rurality, nonprofit status, and hospital size. Results: Palliative care access was higher in states that were older, less racially diverse, higher in socioeconomic status, more liberal, and, as hypothesized, higher in openness. In regression analyses accounting for all predictors and covariates, higher openness continued to account for better state-level access to palliative care (β = 0.428, p = 0.008). Agreeableness also emerged as predicting better access. In sensitivity analyses, personality findings persisted, and less rural states and those with more nonprofits had better access. Conclusions: Palliative care access is worse in states lower in openness, meaning where residents are more skeptical, traditional, and concrete. Personality theory offers recommendations for palliative care advocates communicating with administrators, legislators, philanthropists, and patients to expand access in low-openness states.
KW - advocacy
KW - health disparities
KW - palliative care
KW - personality
KW - policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066762388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2018.0206
DO - 10.1089/jpm.2018.0206
M3 - Article
C2 - 30615552
AN - SCOPUS:85066762388
SN - 1096-6218
VL - 22
SP - 628
EP - 634
JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine
JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine
IS - 6
ER -