Systematic review of contemporary outcomes of endovascular and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Rodolfo V. Rocha, Thomas F. Lindsay, Jan O. Friedrich, Shubham Shan, Sidhartha Sinha, Bobby Yanagawa, Mohammed Al-Omran, Thomas L. Forbes, Maral Ouzounian

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to provide a systematic review of the literature reporting the contemporary early outcomes after endovascular and open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched for studies from January 2006 to March 2018 that reported either endovascular (using branched or fenestrated endografts) or open repair of TAAA in at least 10 patients. Outcomes of interest included perioperative mortality, spinal cord injury (SCI), renal failure requiring dialysis, and stroke. Pooled proportions were determined using a random-effects model. Results: The analysis included 71 studies, of which 24 and 47 reported outcomes after endovascular and open TAAA repair, respectively. Endovascular cohort patients were older and had higher rates of coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes. Endovascular repair was associated with higher rates of SCI (13.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5%-16.7%) compared with open repair (7.4%; 95% CI, 6.2%-8.7%; P < .01) but similar rates of permanent paralysis (5.2% [95% CI, 3.8%-6.7%] vs 4.4% [95% CI, 3.3%-5.6%]; P = .39), lower rates of postoperative dialysis (6.4% [95% CI, 3.2%-9.5%] vs 12.0% [95% CI, 8.2%-16.3%]; P = .03) but similar rates of being discharged on permanent dialysis (3.7% [95% CI, 2.0%-5.9%] vs 3.8% [95% CI, 2.9%-5.3%]; P = .93), a trend to lower stroke (2.7% [95% CI, 1.9%-3.6%] vs 3.9% [95% CI, 3.0%-4.9%]; P = .06), and similar perioperative mortality (7.4% [95% CI, 5.9%-9.1%] vs 8.9% [95% CI, 7.2%-10.9%]; P = .21). Conclusions: This systematic review summarizes the contemporary literature results of endovascular and open TAAA repair. Endovascular repair studies included patients with more comorbidities and were associated with higher rates of SCI but similar rates of permanent paraplegia, whereas open repair studies had higher rates of postoperative dialysis but similar rates of being discharged on permanent dialysis. Perioperative mortality rates were similar. Universally adopted reporting standards for patient characteristics, outcomes, and the conduct of contemporary comparative studies will allow better assessment and comparisons of the risks associated with the two surgical treatment options for TAAA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1396-1412.e12
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aneurysm
  • Aorta
  • Meta-analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic
  • Thoracoabdominal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic review of contemporary outcomes of endovascular and open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this