TY - JOUR
T1 - The Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress (EADES) Questionnaire
T2 - Development and Validation
AU - Ozier, Amy D.
AU - Kendrick, Olivia W.
AU - Knol, Linda L.
AU - Leeper, James D.
AU - Perko, Mike
AU - Burnham, Joy
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - Objective: To develop and validate the Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress (EADES) Questionnaire that was created to measure how one uses food to cope with stress and emotions. Design: Data were collected from a cross-sectional study using the EADES Questionnaire. Subjects/Setting: Convenience sample (response rate 22%) from a southeastern public university, including staff and faculty (n=854) with ages ranging from 18 to 83 years and a mean body mass index of 27.3±6.4. Statistical Analysis Performed: Exploratory factor analysis was completed on 54 items that were originally meant to describe constructs from the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Reliability of scales was estimated using Cronbach's α. Total sum scores were given to each factor. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed linear associations between factors. Results: Three factors accounting for 43.5% of the variance were retained with a total Cronbach's α=.949. The factors did not represent the theoretical constructs from the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping as anticipated. A new model was created, including Emotion- and Stress-Related Eating, Appraisal of Resources and Ability to Cope, Appraisal of Outside Stressors and Influences with Cronbach's α being .949, .869, and .652, respectively. These factors were significantly correlated with one another. Conclusions: The EADES model provides a viable conceptual model to help explain variables that may contribute to overeating, whereas the EADES Questionnaire provides a measurement tool for evaluating these variables that have not traditionally been explored in weight management efforts.
AB - Objective: To develop and validate the Eating and Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress (EADES) Questionnaire that was created to measure how one uses food to cope with stress and emotions. Design: Data were collected from a cross-sectional study using the EADES Questionnaire. Subjects/Setting: Convenience sample (response rate 22%) from a southeastern public university, including staff and faculty (n=854) with ages ranging from 18 to 83 years and a mean body mass index of 27.3±6.4. Statistical Analysis Performed: Exploratory factor analysis was completed on 54 items that were originally meant to describe constructs from the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Reliability of scales was estimated using Cronbach's α. Total sum scores were given to each factor. Pearson correlation coefficients assessed linear associations between factors. Results: Three factors accounting for 43.5% of the variance were retained with a total Cronbach's α=.949. The factors did not represent the theoretical constructs from the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping as anticipated. A new model was created, including Emotion- and Stress-Related Eating, Appraisal of Resources and Ability to Cope, Appraisal of Outside Stressors and Influences with Cronbach's α being .949, .869, and .652, respectively. These factors were significantly correlated with one another. Conclusions: The EADES model provides a viable conceptual model to help explain variables that may contribute to overeating, whereas the EADES Questionnaire provides a measurement tool for evaluating these variables that have not traditionally been explored in weight management efforts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947329233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jada.2007.01.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 17383268
AN - SCOPUS:33947329233
SN - 0002-8223
VL - 107
SP - 619
EP - 628
JO - Journal of the American Dietetic Association
JF - Journal of the American Dietetic Association
IS - 4
ER -