The Out-of-Sample Prediction of Annual Operating Cash Flow: A Comparison of Regression and Naive Forecast Models

Rick N Francis, Lori M Olsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study proposes that a no-change naive forecast of (operating) cash flow is as accurate as tim-series (firm-specific) and cross-sectional regression forecasts of cash flow. The study first demonstrates that cross-sectional regression forecasts of cash flow with firm-size controls are as accurate as time-series regression forecasts. Next the study confirms the expectation that a naive forecast is as accurate as the regression model forecasts. Finally, the study identifies apparent misapplications of Theil's U-statistic, which overstate the ability of regression forecast models to outperform a naive forecast model.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-93
JournalAdvances in Financial Planning and Forecasting
Volume6
StatePublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Out-of-Sample Prediction of Annual Operating Cash Flow: A Comparison of Regression and Naive Forecast Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this