Women, power, and sex composition in small groups: An evolutionary perspective

Stephen M. Colarelli, Jennifer L. Spranger, Ma Regina Hechanova

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite the massive influx of women into the workforce, women have made only minor gains into top management positions. Most explanations for this asymmetry have been based on sex differences in socialization and traits. We propose that an evolutionary psychological perspective offers an alternative explanation: sex differences in power are due to differences in the way men and women use influence behaviors in small groups, and these differences were sculpted, in part, by natural selection. This produced sex differences in psychological and physiological mechanisms - principally in the neuroendocrine system - that influence motivations to use influence in groups. We review studies on sex differences in influence in small groups. For each type of influence behavior that we examine - competition, dominance, and coalition formation - we discuss ultimate and proximate causes. We conclude with implications for future research and for public and organizational policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-184
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Women, power, and sex composition in small groups: An evolutionary perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this