TY - JOUR
T1 - Working after retirement: Features of Bridge Employment and Research Directions
AU - Beehr, Terry A
AU - Bennett, Misty Marie
A2 - Wang, Mo
PY - 2014/12/30
Y1 - 2014/12/30
N2 - The majority of (U.S.) retirees now work for pay after they retire from their major/longer-term job, a phenomenon
referred to as bridge employment. Retirement can take many forms, as can bridge employment, which is
sometimes considered a form of partial retirement spanning the period from full-time work to full retirement.
Although bridge employment has occurred for a long time, its study in the social sciences is relatively new and
sparse. The definitions of bridge employment and related constructs (e.g., retirement, career job) are somewhat
ambiguous, particularly regarding operational definitions for research purposes. We examine the definition of
bridge employment, propose a taxonomy of 16 forms of bridge jobs, and propose several theories that can explain
bridge employment or at least some versions or stages of it. Determining predictors of bridge employment is
a common issue in bridge employment research. Predictors typically include individual characteristics of older
employees and their work situations; we propose a model suggesting that broader societal factors also play a role.
Work fulfills both manifest (financial) and latent (psychological) functions for employees, and bridge employment
helps fulfill some of the same functions, although research on reactions to bridge employment is rare. Finally,
we present a comprehensive model of the bridge employment decision-making process, differentiating between
planning, intention, behavior (i.e., taking a bridge job), and adjustment to the bridge job. Multiple research issues
and avenues for future research are presented.
AB - The majority of (U.S.) retirees now work for pay after they retire from their major/longer-term job, a phenomenon
referred to as bridge employment. Retirement can take many forms, as can bridge employment, which is
sometimes considered a form of partial retirement spanning the period from full-time work to full retirement.
Although bridge employment has occurred for a long time, its study in the social sciences is relatively new and
sparse. The definitions of bridge employment and related constructs (e.g., retirement, career job) are somewhat
ambiguous, particularly regarding operational definitions for research purposes. We examine the definition of
bridge employment, propose a taxonomy of 16 forms of bridge jobs, and propose several theories that can explain
bridge employment or at least some versions or stages of it. Determining predictors of bridge employment is
a common issue in bridge employment research. Predictors typically include individual characteristics of older
employees and their work situations; we propose a model suggesting that broader societal factors also play a role.
Work fulfills both manifest (financial) and latent (psychological) functions for employees, and bridge employment
helps fulfill some of the same functions, although research on reactions to bridge employment is rare. Finally,
we present a comprehensive model of the bridge employment decision-making process, differentiating between
planning, intention, behavior (i.e., taking a bridge job), and adjustment to the bridge job. Multiple research issues
and avenues for future research are presented.
UR - http://workar.oxfordjournals.org/content/1/1
M3 - Article
VL - 1
SP - 112
EP - 128
JO - Work, Aging, and Retirement
JF - Work, Aging, and Retirement
IS - 1
ER -