TY - JOUR
T1 - Youth and parent perceptions on participating in specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation options
T2 - A qualitative timeline effect analysis
AU - Hurtubise, Karen
AU - Brousselle, Astrid
AU - Noel, Melanie
AU - Jordan, Abbie
AU - White, Jo
AU - Rasic, Nivez
AU - Camden, Chantal
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the parents and children who participated in this study and thank the advisory committee for their guidance. We also extend our gratitude to the Vi Riddell Pediatric Pain Initiative, the Alberta Children’s Hospital Foundation, and the management team of the Vi Riddell Children’s Pain and Rehabilitation Centre at the Alberta Children’s Hospital for their support of this project.
Funding Information:
Karen Hurtubise was a doctoral student supported by the Vanier Scholarship and the Canadian Child Health Clinical Scientist and the Pain in Child Health programs at the time this article was written. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Little is known about how the specialized treatment journey is perceived by youth with pain-related disability and their parents. Aims: Describe and compare the treatment effects and outcomes as perceived by youth and their parents enrolled in intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) or multimodal treatment (MMT). Methods: Eleven IIPT youth and five parents and three MMT youth and five parents were recruited. All were asked to complete a treatment journey timeline, followed by separately conducted semistructured interviews. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. Results: The main themes spanned the treatment trajectory. All participants described similar initial struggles (Theme 1). Positive and negative treatment effects associated with acquisitions and disruptions (Theme 2), and outcomes post-discharge related to supports and realities (Theme 3) emerged. Knowledge, skills, and support acquisition during treatment and feeling empowered and confident to self-manage postdischarge were identified as IIPT benefits. However, the change effort and life disruptions required and the difficulty transitioning to real life postprogram were acknowledged as detrimental IIPT impacts. Continuing with life as usual and maintaining supports in daily contexts (e.g., school personnel, friends) were reported MMT benefits. However, the challenges of managing pain, treatment adherence within the competing demands of daily realities, and the lack of support to integrate strategies were emphasized as detrimental MMT impacts. Conclusions: Detailed impacts of two specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation interventions on the lives of youth with pain-related disability and their parents are described. The treatments benefits and previously unexplored detrimental effects are unveiled.
AB - Background: Little is known about how the specialized treatment journey is perceived by youth with pain-related disability and their parents. Aims: Describe and compare the treatment effects and outcomes as perceived by youth and their parents enrolled in intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) or multimodal treatment (MMT). Methods: Eleven IIPT youth and five parents and three MMT youth and five parents were recruited. All were asked to complete a treatment journey timeline, followed by separately conducted semistructured interviews. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using reflective thematic analysis. Results: The main themes spanned the treatment trajectory. All participants described similar initial struggles (Theme 1). Positive and negative treatment effects associated with acquisitions and disruptions (Theme 2), and outcomes post-discharge related to supports and realities (Theme 3) emerged. Knowledge, skills, and support acquisition during treatment and feeling empowered and confident to self-manage postdischarge were identified as IIPT benefits. However, the change effort and life disruptions required and the difficulty transitioning to real life postprogram were acknowledged as detrimental IIPT impacts. Continuing with life as usual and maintaining supports in daily contexts (e.g., school personnel, friends) were reported MMT benefits. However, the challenges of managing pain, treatment adherence within the competing demands of daily realities, and the lack of support to integrate strategies were emphasized as detrimental MMT impacts. Conclusions: Detailed impacts of two specialized multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation interventions on the lives of youth with pain-related disability and their parents are described. The treatments benefits and previously unexplored detrimental effects are unveiled.
KW - pediatric pain-related disability
KW - qualitative method
KW - specialized pain rehabilitation
KW - timelines
KW - treatment experience
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109133010&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/24740527.2020.1858709
DO - 10.1080/24740527.2020.1858709
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85109133010
SN - 2474-0527
VL - 5
SP - 1
EP - 21
JO - Canadian Journal of Pain
JF - Canadian Journal of Pain
IS - 1
ER -